Skip to content

Continuous Sedation vs Daily Sedation Interruption in Ventilated Children

Comparison of Comfort Scores Between Continuous Midazolam Infusion and Daily Sedation Interruption in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients With Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07438834
Enrollment
96
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
2026-03-02
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia, Respiration Disorders

Brief summary

Sedation is essential for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients to ensure comfort, ventilator synchrony, and prevention of self-extubation. However, excessive sedation may prolong mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, while inadequate sedation may cause agitation and physiological distress. Continuous Sedation Infusion (CSI) and Daily Sedation Interruption (DSI) are two commonly used strategies. Limited data exist comparing their impact on comfort levels in pediatric patients. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare comfort scores between continuous Midazolam infusion and daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated children aged 5-10 years diagnosed with pneumonia. Comfort will be assessed using the COMFORT-B Scale and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) every 6 hours for 72 hours. The study intends to determine which strategy better maintains optimal sedation and comfort in pediatric intensive care settings.

Interventions

OTHERContinuous Sedation Infusion (CSI)

Participants receive continuous intravenous Midazolam infusion titrated according to COMFORT-B and RASS scores following PICU sedation protocol.

OTHERDaily Sedation Interruption (DSI)

Participants receive Midazolam infusion with daily interruption for 1-2 hours to assess neurological function and comfort level. Sedation is restarted if needed and titrated according to scoring scales.

Sponsors

University of Health Sciences Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosed with pneumonia Requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours Requiring sedation with intravenous Midazolam Written informed consent obtained from parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Pre-existing neurological impairment (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke, cerebral palsy) that may interfere with comfort assessment Presence of central nervous system symptoms affecting sedation evaluation Contraindication to Midazolam (e.g., hypersensitivity, severe hypotension, significant hepatic dysfunction) Receiving multiple sedative agents in addition to Midazolam Refusal of parental or guardian consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean COMFORT-B ScoreEvery 6 hours during the first 72 hours of mechanical ventilation.Measurement of patient comfort using the COMFORT-B Scale. Scores range from 6 to 30, with 11-22 indicating optimal sedation. Mean scores will be compared between the two intervention groups.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026