Skip to content

Eye-cervical Re-education and Motor Control Training Program in Chronic Neck Pain

Comparative Effects of an Eye-cervical Re-education and Motor Control Training Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Chronic Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07438548
Enrollment
52
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
2025-01-13
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Neck Pain

Keywords

Chronic Neck Pain, Neck Ache, Eye-cervical Re-education, Motor Control Training Program, Functional Disability

Brief summary

The study was conducted to determine the comparative effects of an eye-cervical re-education and motor control training program on pain, range of motion and functional disability in chronic neck pain

Interventions

Eye-cervical Re-education program was carried out consisting of 10 proprioceptive reprogramming intervention steps : Activation of eye muscles, Passive cervical mobilization with fixed gaze, Active cervical mobility with directed gaze , Global cervical motion exercise , Neck mobility with the trunk , Head reposition exercise (Active), Head reposition exercise (Passive), Free coordination exercise, Manual resistance coordination exercise and Oculo-cervical coordination with soft stimuli. All exercises were done ten times each. 24 sessions were conducted for 8 weeks, with 3 sessions scheduled every week.

OTHERMotor Control Training Program

Motor Control Training Program was performed in supine position. It consisted of four parts, which include the cranio-cervical flexor exercise; co-contraction of neck flexors and extensors; the cranio-cervical extensor exercise; and the scapular re-education exercises. An air-filled cuff was put behind the neck and the patient tried to make five progressive positions with an increase in ROM i.e. to make improvements in pressure of 22, 24, 26, 28 and eventually 30 mmHg on pressure gauge. All exercises were done ten times each. 24 sessions were conducted for 8 weeks, with 3 sessions scheduled every week.

Electric Hot pack and TENS having (200 µs pulse-width, 1Hz frequency) were applied for 10 minutes.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neck pain for minimum 3 months * Pain intensity on NPRS between 4 to 7 * Limited neck range of motion * Medical diagnosis (Grade-II Neck pain) as per classification by "Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010" * Cervical discomfort resulting from repetitive motion or prolonged postures.

Exclusion criteria

* History of neck trauma/Fracture/Surgery/ Whiplash Injury * Systemic illness, rheumatic conditions, inflammatory joint disease * Other spine pathologies Cervical myelopathy / Fibromyalgia / Multiple Sclerosis/ Cervical radiculopathy * Tumor symptoms like high temperature, shivering, night pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating ScaleFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksNumeric Pain Rating Scale is a subjective measure using which patient's rate their pain. It consists of 11 points, having an overall score ranging from 0 to 10, where: 0, 1 - 3, 4 - 6, 7 - 10 represents no pain, mild, moderate and the most severe pain respectively
Neck Disability Index in Urdu languageFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksNeck pain disability index is used for the disability of the neck or the impact of neck pain on a person. It consists of 10 questions on pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Performance in each item is described in 6 stages, from 0 to 5 points. The total of 0-4 points indicate no disability, 5-14 points indicate mild disability, 15-24 points indicate moderate disability, 25-34 points indicate severe disability and 35-50 points indicate complete disability
ROM Cervical spine (Flexion)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine flexion ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.
ROM Cervical Spine (Extension)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine extension ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.
ROM Cervical Spine (Lateral Flexion) Left SideFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine lateral flexion on left side ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.
ROM Cervical Spine (Lateral Flexion) Right SideFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine lateral flexion on right side ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.
ROM Cervical Spine (Rotation) Left SideFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine rotation on left side ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.
ROM Cervical Spine (Rotation) Right SideFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksChanges in cervical spine rotation on right side ROM at baseline and 8th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAli Raza, MS

Riphah International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026