Social Support, Vaping
Conditions
Keywords
Vaping Cessation, Peer Support, Mentoring
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to understand the feasibility and acceptability of integrating peer mentoring into a social media-based intervention to help adolescents and young adults quit e-cigarette use.
Detailed description
This study is a one-arm pilot trial with adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users. This study tested a peer-mentored program to help teens and young adults quit vaping using social media. Participants joined one of two inter groups and received messages from a trained counselor over 5 weeks. Each group also included two peer mentors who had successfully quit vaping and offered support. Participants completed surveys before and after the program.
Interventions
The QTH program delivered 1-3 evidence-based vaping cessation messages per weekday via Instagram over 5 weeks. Peer mentors, aged similarly to participants and who had successfully quit vaping, provided social support, encouragement, and one-on-one direct messaging.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for intervention participants: 1. English literacy; 2. aged 13 to 21; 3. use social media at least four days per week; 4. vape at least once per week in the past 30 days; 5. are considering or interested in quitting within the next six months or 30 days; and 6. resided in California. Inclusion criteria for peer mentors: 1. English literacy; 2. aged 18-29; 3. have quit e-cigarettes for more than 3 months; 4. are willing to participate in an approximately 2-hour online training and pass the test after training; and 5. will commit to provide support to help peers quit vaping in Instagram groups for 5 weeks (approximately 20 mins/day).
Exclusion criteria
for intervention participants: Individuals who do not meet the inclusion criteria.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility: Engagement and retention | 5 Weeks | Engagement measured by number of posts and likes in the Instagram group. Retention defined as proportion completing the 5-week follow-up survey. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Usefulness of Peer Mentoring | 5 Weeks | Perceived usefulness was assessed in the follow-up survey with 9 statements, measuring agreement using a 5-point Likert scale (1 disagree a lot to 5 agree a lot). Example items included "the peer mentors helped me quit vaping," "the peer mentors shared useful information on quitting," and "the peer mentors increased my confidence that I can quit." |
| Satisfaction with Peer Mentoring | 5 Weeks | Satisfaction with peer mentoring was assessed with six statements on the follow-up survey, measuring agreement using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree a lot to 5 = agree a lot). Items included "I liked the peer mentoring in the program," "I felt comfortable with the messages I got from peer mentors," "the peer mentors sent messages at convenient times of day," etc. Additionally, participants rated their satisfaction with the quantity of peer mentor posts on a 5-point scale by responding to the item |
| Evaluation of the program | 5 Weeks | The overall evaluation of the peer mentored vaping cessation program was measured using four statements, measuring agreement on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree a lot to 5 = agree a lot). The four items were "I would recommend this program to others", "The program gave me something new to think about", "I thought about what I read in the program", and "The program was easy to understand." |
| Self-Reported 7-Day Point Prevalent Abstinence (PPA) from vaping | 5 Weeks | 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) will be assessed via the question about the number of days they used e-cigarettes in the past 7 days at the end of the intervention. Participants reporting no vaping in the past 7 days will be coded as abstinent. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco