Skip to content

Analgesic Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Patients Undergoing Lateral Thoracotomy Using Opoid Sparing Anesthesia

Analgesic Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Patients Undergoing Lateral Thoracotomy Using Opoid Sparing Anesthesia . A Comparative Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07437027
Acronym
ESPvsTPVB
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Thoracotomy Pain

Keywords

Opoid free anesthesia

Brief summary

AimoftheWork To assess the efficiency of Opoid free anaesthesia with paravertebral block compared to opoid free anaesthesia with erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing Thoracotomy.

Detailed description

There is growing evidence showing that opoid-free anesthesia (OFA), including loco-regional anesthesia and non-opioid drugs, is feasible in several surgical settings. The surgeries for pathologies involving the lungs and mediastinum involves different types of thoracic surgical incision such as anterolateral or posterolateral. Post thoracotomy pain affects 30%-50% of the patients undergoing thoracotomy.Poorly managed pain following thoracotomy can lead to increase the risk of complications such as lung collapse and chest infections due to altered mechanical functions of the lungs and ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Acute thoracotomy pain is multifactorial in nature. It involves nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms originating from somatic and visceral afferents. The main sources of pain are intercostal nerves,the vagus nerve and phrenic nerve in the pleura, the superficial cervical plexus, and the brachial plexus in the ipsilateral shoulder. So, Analgesia is a major determinant of balanced anesthesia and it is usually achieved by administering opioid agents, which are well tolerated and maintain hemodynamic stability in the perioperative period. However, perioperative opioid administration is not risk-free. Opioids are associated with life-threatening side effects such as respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, constipation, urinary retention, immunomodulation and neurotoxicity. In addition, opioid prescription after surgery seems to trigger the development of opioid addiction, thus contributing to the widespread opioid misuse observed worldwide. Several studies found a correlation between postoperative opioid administration, the development of chronic pain and opioid addiction. Therefore,opioid administration should be reduced or avoided as much as possible. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered as the gold standard for thoracotomy pain(4)However, according to a recent systematic review, The thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has been shown to be as effective as TEA with reduction of the risks of minor complications compared to TEA. Emerging research has shown that the novel erector spinaeplane block(ESPB) can be employed as a simple and safe alternative analgesic technique for acute postsurgical, post-traumatic, and chronic neuropathic thoracic pain in adults. The goal of this study is to assess the Analgesic efficiency of erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy using opoid sparing anesthesia.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup A :Thoracic paravertebral block

Ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block performed at the T5 level using 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy

PROCEDUREErector Spinae Plane Block

ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block will be performed at the T5 level using 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine as part of an opoid sparing anesthesia protocol for lateral thoracotomy

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients age between 18 and 70 . * Patients with ASAII and IIIstatus. * Patients undergoing open surgical Thoracotomy as in lobectomy, pneumonectomy, segmentectomy and decortication. * Gender both males and females. 2.Exclusioncriteria 1. Refusal of the patient. 2. Allergy to local anesthetic 3. Infection of the skin at the site of local infiltration 4. Cardiovascular problems (arrhythmia, heart block, SVT,AF, multiple extra systole). 5. Any contraindication to regional anesthesia as coagulopathy 6. Patients with chronic pain or on opoid medication preoperative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total morphine consumption for the first 24 hours postoperativeWithin the first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative painAt 0,2,6,12,24 hours post operativePostoperative pain will be assessed using vas score at 0,2,6,12,24 hours post operative

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTEman Mamdouh Mahmoud Hussien (emanmmh), Assistant lecturer
Eman.mamdouh31@gmail.com201002087146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026