Skip to content

The Efficacy of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum Fragrans Wild) Mouthwash in Reducing Oral Bacteria Growth: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Nursing Practice

The Efficacy of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum Fragrans Wild) Mouthwash in Reducing Oral Bacteria Growth: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Nursing Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07434882
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
2025-06-19
Completion date
2025-11-25
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Bacteria Levels in the Mouth

Keywords

Herbal, Mouthwash, Oral Bacteria, Oral Diseases, Oral Hygiene

Brief summary

Background and Objectives: This study investigated the antibacterial efficacy of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum fragrans Wild) extract as a mouthwash alternative to mitigate oral bacteria, particularly Streptococcus mutans. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed with a cohort of 100 female students, divided into four groups to assess varying concentrations (1%, 2%, and 4%) of Sesewanua extract, along with a purified water control. The extraction process involved mechanical grinding followed by maceration with 70% ethanol to maximize the extraction of bioactive compounds. Microbiological analysis was conducted post-intervention to measure the reduction in bacterial counts.

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL1% sesewanua extract mouthwash Arm

Participants who used 1% sesewanua extract mouthwash

BIOLOGICAL2% sesewanua extract mouthwash

participants who used 2% sesewanua extract mouthwash

BIOLOGICAL4% sesewanua extract mouthwash Arm

participants who used 4% sesewanua extract mouthwash

OTHERcontrol/placebo (distilled water)

control/placebo (distilled water)

Sponsors

Poltekkes Kemenkes Manado
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study employed a randomized, controlled, parallel-group interventional model with allocation concealment and assessor blinding. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with block sizes of four to ensure balanced group sizes; allocation assignments were sealed in opaque envelopes opened by an independent coordinator. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation; mouthwash bottles were identical and labeled by code. The intervention period lasted 14 days with baseline, day-7 (midpoint) and day-14 (endpoint) assessments to evaluate temporal effects. Adherence was monitored via daily logs and residual volume measurement; participants with \<80% adherence were analyzed per-protocol and sensitivity analyses included intention-to-treat with last-observation-carried-forward for missing data. Adverse events were recorded at each visit.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female students registered as residents of the female dormitory at the Manado Ministry of Health Polytechnic during the study period. 2. Age ≥17 years. 3. Willing to sign written informed consent. 4. Good oral and general health status based on initial screening (no acute oral infections, severely inflamed gums, or other oral conditions requiring immediate treatment). 5. Not currently using medications or therapies that could modulate oral flora (e.g., systemic antibiotics, therapeutic oral antiseptics) in the past 2 weeks. 6. Able to follow standardized oral hygiene protocols (able to brush and rinse as instructed).

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 2. History of allergy to ingredients in mouthwash formulations (e.g., fragrances, parabens, sorbitol). 3. Use of antibiotics, antifungals, systemic steroids, or immunosuppressive medications in the 2 weeks before or during the study. 4. Invasive dental treatment or oral surgery in the past 1 month. 5. Systemic diseases that can affect saliva composition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, severe xerostomia, oral autoimmune diseases). 6. Active smoking or use of other tobacco products. 7. Non-compliance with protocols (e.g., failure to show up for sample collection).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Streptococcus mutans colony counts (CFU/ml) in participants' oral samples between pre-intervention and post-intervention. Secondary OutcomeResearch timeline for a quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum fragrans Wild) mouthwash in reducing the growth of Streptococcus mutans. Total duration: 12 weeks (3 months).Outcome Measure 1 (Primary; continuous; CFU/mL): Change in Streptococcus mutans colony counts (CFU/mL) in oral samples from baseline (pre-intervention) to end of treatment (post-intervention within 12 weeks). For each group (1%, 2%, 4%, placebo), within-group change will be evaluated using paired t-tests; results will be reported as mean (SD) CFU/mL at each time point and mean (SD) change.
Outcome Measure 2 (Secondary A; continuous; %):Research timeline for a quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum fragrans Wild) mouthwash in reducing the growth of Streptococcus mutans. Total duration: 12 weeks (3 months).Participant-level percent reduction in S. mutans CFU/mL. Between-group differences in mean percent reduction will be tested using one-way ANOVA (with appropriate post-hoc comparisons if overall p\<0.05).
Outcome Measure 3 (Secondary B; categorical; proportion):Research timeline for a quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of Sesewanua (Clerodendrum fragrans Wild) mouthwash in reducing the growth of Streptococcus mutans. Total duration: 12 weeks (3 months).Clinically meaningful response rate, defined as achieving ≥50% reduction in CFU/mL from baseline to post-intervention.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026