Skip to content

Prospective Evaluation of the Carbon Footprint and Clinical Utility of IBUS Compared to Colonoscopy and Enterography in UC and CD

Prospective Evaluation of the Carbon Footprint and Clinical Utility of Intestinal Bowel Ultrasound Compared to Colonoscopy and Enterography in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07431983
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-02-25
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohns Disease, Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Brief summary

Healthcare contributes approximately 4.4% of global GHG emissions, with diagnostic imaging and endoscopic services being substantial contributors. Colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging modalities, though indispensable, are associated with high carbon emissions due to electricity use, waste, sterilisation, and transportation. IBUS, a non-invasive, real-time diagnostic modality, is increasingly validated for disease activity assessment in both UC and CD.

Detailed description

Healthcare contributes approximately 4.4% of global GHG emissions, with diagnostic imaging and endoscopic services being substantial contributors. Colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging modalities, though indispensable, are associated with high carbon emissions due to electricity use, waste, sterilisation, and transportation. IBUS, a non-invasive, real-time diagnostic modality, is increasingly validated for disease activity assessment in both UC and CD. Its low energy footprint and portability make it a potential frontline tool for sustainable IBD follow-up. This study aims to quantify and compare the environmental impact and diagnostic value of IBUS versus conventional imaging strategies in real-world clinical care.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopy procedures with consent for procedures, during the study period will be included

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The electricity consumed, water consumed, waste generated, and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions will be analyzed12 monthsThe waste generated will be stratified according to the methods of disposal as Direct landfill, Incineration, and landfill or Recyclable waste. The electricity consumed, water consumed, waste generated, and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions will be analyzed. The unit of emissions will remain same kgCO2e and the total emissions will then be calculated.

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTDr.Hardik Rughwani
dr.hardikr@aighospitals.com9426928600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 13, 2026