Skip to content

Pain Evaluation Across Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Procedures

Pain Evaluation Across Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Procedures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07431892
Acronym
PEARL
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-02-25
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2028-09-01
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer Patients, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Keywords

colorectal surgery, minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, postoperative pain, Nociception Level Index (NOL)

Brief summary

Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal conditions, such as laparoscopic or robotic surgery, has been shown to offer benefits over traditional open surgery. These benefits include less pain after surgery, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications. This study aims to compare two types of minimally invasive surgery-laparoscopic and robotic surgery-to determine which approach results in less postoperative pain for patients undergoing colon or rectal surgery. The central hypothesis is that robotic surgery, due to its higher precision and reduced tissue trauma, will lead to lower pain levels after surgery. The study will enroll adult patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery at the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón in Madrid. Participants will undergo either laparoscopic or robotic surgery based on clinical availability and surgical planning, as long as they meet all inclusion criteria under the hospital's enhanced recovery protocol (RICA program). Researchers will assess patients' pain levels at different time points after surgery (immediately after recovery, at 24, 48, and 72 hours, and at discharge) using validated pain scales. The use of pain medications, hospital stay duration, complication rates, and quality of life up to 12 months after surgery will also be measured. All patient data will be collected anonymously using a secure electronic system (REDCap). The study will last approximately 2 years and include about 80 patients (40 in each group). The results could help surgeons and hospitals choose the most effective surgical approach to reduce postoperative pain and improve patient recovery in colorectal surgery.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, observational study conducted at the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón in Madrid, Spain. The study compares postoperative pain outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery via two different minimally invasive surgical approaches: laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. Eligible participants will be adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective colon or rectal surgery for benign or malignant disease, provided they meet the criteria of the hospital's Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program, known locally as the RICA protocol. Patients with open surgery indications, chronic analgesic use, or other exclusion criteria (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, multivisceral resections, chronic opioid use, or inability to follow the RICA protocol) will not be included. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at standardized time points: on arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit, upon admission to the surgical ward, and at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively, as well as at discharge. Intraoperative nociception will also be evaluated using the Nociception Level Index (NOL), an objective measure that reflects the patient's pain response during surgery. Additional outcomes include postoperative opioid consumption, length of hospital stay, complication rates (using the Clavien-Dindo classification), hospital readmissions, reintervention rates, and patient-reported quality of life measures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, using validated questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and EQ-5D). Data will be collected and stored securely using the REDCap electronic data capture system, ensuring patient confidentiality. The estimated sample size is 80 patients (approximately 40 in each group), and the total study duration is expected to be 2 years for recruitment and follow-up, with an additional period for data analysis and publication. The goal is to generate high-quality evidence to help guide clinical decision-making in the selection of surgical approaches for colorectal surgery, focusing on reducing postoperative pain and enhancing recovery.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * Signed informed consent * Meeting inclusion requirements of the hospital's Enhanced Recovery Protocol (RICA program), including: * Adequate cognitive status * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification I, II, or III * Elective colon surgery (right or left hemicolectomy) for malignant disease * Planned laparoscopic or robotic surgical approach * Preoperative evaluation completed as per RICA protocol (nutritional, nursing, anesthetic, and pharmacy assessments)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a preoperative decision for open surgery * Patients undergoing rectal surgery (partial or total mesorectal excision without protective stoma) * Patients with inflammatory bowel disease requiring colorectal resection * Patients requiring multivisceral resection due to oncologic indications identified intraoperatively * Extraction incision different from Pfannenstiel approach * Current or past history of chronic opioid use or opioid abuse * Current or past history of benzodiazepine use or abuse * Chronic use of analgesics for other comorbid medical conditions * Current or past history of recreational drug use or abuse * Non-compliance with the RICA protocol, including: * Lack of preoperative nutritional, nursing, anesthetic, or pharmacy evaluation * Non-adherence to preoperative care protocols (e.g., premedication, fasting, carbohydrate loading, thromboembolism prophylaxis, antibiotic prophylaxis, anesthetic care guidelines)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain24 hoursAssessment of patient-reported postoperative pain at 24 hours after surgery, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain at 48 Hours Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)48 hours post-surgeryAssessment of patient-reported postoperative pain at 48 hours after surgery, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Postoperative Pain at 72 Hours Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)72 hours post-surgeryAssessment of patient-reported postoperative pain at 72 hours after surgery, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Intraoperative Analgesic ConsumptionIntraoperative periodTotal intraoperative consumption of opioids (fentanyl and remifentanil), recorded in micrograms, as an indirect measure of nociception and analgesic requirements during surgery.
Postoperative Analgesic ConsumptionFrom recovery room admission up to 72 hours after surgery.Total amount and type of analgesic medication administered during the postoperative hospital stay, including both scheduled and rescue analgesia.
Postoperative Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Classification)Within 30 days after surgeryIncidence and severity of postoperative complications up to 30 days after surgery, categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Patients without complications will be recorded as Grade 0. Complications will be graded from Grade I (minor deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, or radiological interventions) to Grade V (death of the patient). The minimum possible value is 0 and the maximum possible value is V. Higher grades reflect greater severity of complications and therefore worse clinical outcomes.
Conversion Rate to Open SurgeryIntraoperative periodNumber and percentage of patients requiring conversion from laparoscopic or robotic approach to open surgery during the procedure.
Postoperative Inflammatory ResponseWithin the first 48 hours post-surgeryMeasurement of postoperative systemic inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein (CRP), at predefined postoperative time points (e.g., 24h and 48h).
Quality of Life (QoL) After Surgery1 month post-surgeryAssessment of patient-reported quality of life using questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTPatricia Tejedor Patricia Tejedor, M.D., Ph.D.
tejedorpat@gmail.com0034915 86 80 00
CONTACTJoaquín Mascaró Joaquín Mascaró, M.D.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPatricia Tejedor Patricia Tejedor, M.D.,Ph.D.

University Hospital Gregorio Marañón

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026