Skip to content

Boosting and Mapping Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques

Boosting and Mapping Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-induced Plasticity in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07431697
Acronym
BoMAP NIBS
Enrollment
22
Registered
2026-02-24
Start date
2023-02-02
Completion date
2024-04-12
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Young Participants

Keywords

Non-invasive brain stimulation

Brief summary

In this study we applied TMS to the hand area of M1 whilst acquiring fMRI of the brain. This study tested whether a higher-frequency form of brain stimulation, called high-gamma (100Hz) intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), more effectively increases brain excitability than the standard 50Hz iTBS. In a double-blind, randomized study with 22 healthy participants, brain activity and motor responses were measured using TMS-fMRI. The 100Hz iTBS condition produced stronger and more consistent increases in motor excitability and greater activation of sensorimotor brain regions compared to 50Hz and sham stimulation, suggesting it may be a more effective approach for non-invasive neuromodulation.

Detailed description

This study investigates whether a modified form of brain stimulation called high-gamma intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can more effectively and consistently increase brain excitability compared to the standard iTBS protocol. iTBS is a non-invasive method that uses magnetic pulses to influence brain activity, but responses vary widely between people. In this double-blind, randomized, within-subject study, 22 healthy adults completed three sessions of brain stimulation combined with functional MRI (TMS-fMRI). Each participant received conventional 50Hz iTBS, high-gamma 100Hz iTBS, and a sham (placebo) condition on separate visits. Changes in motor cortex excitability were measured using motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and brain activity and connectivity were assessed using fMRI. The results showed that 100Hz iTBS produced stronger and more reliable increases in cortical excitability compared to both the 50Hz and sham conditions. High-gamma iTBS also activated broader areas of the sensorimotor network and showed stronger links between stimulation strength and neural response. These findings suggest that high-gamma iTBS may be a more effective and physiologically relevant approach for non-invasive brain stimulation in humans.

Interventions

DEVICEIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) as a protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

iTBS applies a train of 3 pulses of stimulation, delivered at a gamma frequency, then repeated 10x at a theta repetition rate. Intensity of stimulation is personalized based on the individual's resting motor threshold, determined at the start of the session and delivered at 70% of this.

Sponsors

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Right handed

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to either TMS or MRI: Pregnant Metal implants Use of recreational drugs Neurological conditions History of seizures or epilepsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Throughout the whole experiment, for a total of 26minsfMRI of the brain and spinal chord were acquired during stimulation with single pulse TMS to elucidate the changes in BOLD activity occurring from the intervention.
Motor evoked potentials (MEPs)MEPs are measured for 8mins immediately before intervention, then 15mins after intervention for a further 8mins.When single pulses of TMS are applied to M1 hand region, MEPs are evoked in the corresponding hand muscle which can be measured with electromyography (EMG). The amplitude of the MEPs before and after the iTBS interventions are then measured and compared to determine the response to the iTBS, whether this is facilitation, suppression, or no change.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026