Skip to content

Does Aerobic Exercise Affect Memory and Fatigue After Acquired Brain Injury?

Does Aerobic Exercise Affect Memory, Attention, Working Memory, and Fatigue After Acquired Brain Injury? A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07429526
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-02-24
Start date
2013-11-01
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, TBI

Keywords

stroke, TBI, aerobic training, cognition, fatigue, MRI

Brief summary

Acquired brain injury can affect cognition and cause fatigue. Aerobic exercise has been linked to improved cognition in the general population. This is thought to occur through boosting neuroplasticity, that is to say the brain's ability to change and adapt. Investigators explored the effects of aerobic exercise after acquired brain injury and investigated if any changes on the brain could be detected. This was done through an 8-week period of 30 min of aerobic exercise, 3-4 times a week for a group of 6 participants compared with 6 participants that did their usual training. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to detect any changes on the brain.

Detailed description

The objective is to study the effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function, fatigue and neuroplasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury with a randomized controlled pilot study. Subjects were patients aged 16-65 years with moderate to severe stroke or traumatic brain injury at least 3 months post injury. The intervention group participated in 30 min of aerobic exercise 3-4 times/week for 8 weeks during their outpatient rehabilitation. The control group received routine physical therapy. In addition, both groups received rehabilitation according to their rehabilitation plan. Neuropsychological and endurance testing was performed before and after the intervention and at a 3 month follow up. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after the intervention.

Interventions

OTHERexercise

30 min of AE, 3-4 times/week for 8 weeks, included in a rehabilitation program based on current guidelines and patient's individual needs.

Sponsors

Danderyd Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A SINGLE BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- First stroke/TBI with CT/MRI verified injury, (moderate to severe brain injury) * Age 18-65 years * at least 3 months after injury * Fluent in Swedish Selection criteria * Cognition: * one standard deviation (SD) below age adjusted normal in at least one of the following tests: verbal memory, visual memory, working memory or attention * be able to follow instructions during neuropsychological (NP) testing. * be able to reach 60-80% of estimated maximal heart rate (HRmax= 220-age) during aerobic testing and training

Exclusion criteria

* \- Severe heart disease * Cognitive defects, not due to the actual stroke or TBI * Moderate depression/anxiety, defined as \>10 respectively on HADS * Severe aphasia * Not fulfilling criterias for MRI (such as pregnancy, having metal parts implanted in the body, afraid of cramped spaces)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MemoryFrom enrolment to the end of participation at 8 weeks and at a 3 month follow upMemory, measured by the following test: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), a test of verbal learning and long-term memory (25). The RAVL Test consists of a 15 noun-word list (list A) that is read to the participants. After the presentation of list A, the participant is requested to recall as many words as possible. The procedure is repeated 5 times, and after each trial recall is recorded and all five recall trials are summed into one score (= immediate recall score). After 5 presentations of list A, an interference-list of 15 other nouns (list B) are read and the participants are asked to recall as many words as possible. Immediately after the recall of list B, the participants are again asked to recall list A. Delayed recall of list A is measured 30 min after the immediate recall (= delayed recall score). The higher the value the better result.
Executive functionsFrom enrolment to the end of participation at 8 weeks and at a 3 month follow uoExecutive functions measured by the following test: Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS) Color Word Test, measures the ability to inhibit automized verbal responses and the ability to use cognitive shifting. The test has four conditions: 1) naming the colors of squares (red, blue or green, 2) reading color words printed in black, 3) naming the printed color of the color words red, blue, or green printed in a different color, which means inhibition of an over-learned function of reading the word; 4) repeatedly switching between a) naming the printed color of the color words red, blue, or green and b) reading the words as quickly as possible. In this condition the person needs to keep track of clues that indicate rule change. Sub tests 1 and 2 are contrast tests and used for comparison between the sub tests 3 and 4 i.e. the more complex tasks. The faster the time, the better which give that lower values represent better results.
AttentionFrom enrolment to the end of participation at 8 weeks and at a 3 month follow upAttention measured by the following tests: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) Measures auditive processing speed, attention, and working memory. The test consists of 60 digits from 1-9 presented at a standardized pace of 2.4 seconds between each digit. The task is to sum each digit with the previously presented one before the next digit is presented. The test was presented according to the manual. The maximum score is 60. This test was also used to measure cognitive fatigability as declining performance in terms of an increased number of incorrect responses on the PASAT. The responses were divided into five sections of 12 numbers each, where the number of correct answers in the first section was subtracted from the number of correct answers in the last section. Fatigability was defined as a lower score at the end of the test compared to the beginning, giving a negative value.
fatigueFrom enrolment to the end of participation at 8 weeks and at a 3 month follow upFatigability was defined as a lower score at the end of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) test compared to the beginning, giving a negative value

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026