Heart Failure, Heart Failure, Diastolic, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF)
Conditions
Keywords
Heart Failure, HFpEF, Preserved Ejection Fraction, Phenotyping, Machine Learning, Data-driven clustering, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, H2FPEF score, HFA-PEFF score, Exercise tolerance
Brief summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn how people with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) can be grouped into different "phenotypes" based on their clinical information. The researchers want to understand whether these groups have different health profiles and different responses during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Can clinical data be used to identify meaningful HFpEF phenotypes? * Do these phenotypes match well-known HFpEF scores, such as the H2FPEF and Heart Failure Association Pre-test Assessment, Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide (HFA-PEFF) scores? * Do people in different phenotypes show different results on a CPET? Participants will: * Have their past clinical records reviewed if they were diagnosed with HFpEF at the Local Health Unit of the Leiria Region (ULS RL); * A smaller group will attend one visit to complete a CPET, which measures how the heart, lungs and muscles respond during exercise. This study includes adults aged 18 years or older who have HFpEF. The study does not involve any new treatments or experimental drugs.
Detailed description
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is a complex condition, and people with HFpEF can have different symptoms and clinical profiles. Understanding these differences may help improve how the condition is described and studied. This study has two parts: a retrospective analysis and a cross-sectional assessment. In the retrospective part, the researchers will collect clinical information that was previously recorded in the hospital's clinical records during past hospitalizations for HFpEF at the Local Health Unit of the Leiria Region (ULS RL). The data will be reviewed and prepared for analysis using standard data quality procedures. After the database is complete, the researchers will use data-driven methods to look for patterns among participants, in order to identify groups of people who share similar characteristics ("phenotypes") without setting predefined categories. Methods will include descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and feature selection using algorithmic approaches such as ReliefF. For phenotyping, unsupervised machine-learning techniques including K-means clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) will be applied. The cross-sectional part will invite a sample of participants selected to represent each phenotype (planned 15 participants for each phenotype) identified in the retrospective analysis. Selected participants will complete a single on-site visit including informed consent verification, a structured clinical review and a standardized cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performed according to local and international guidelines. The CPET procedures will follow the laboratory protocol, namely calibration of equipment, resting measurements, incremental workload protocol, continuous gas exchange, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. CPET data will be recorded in digital format and transferred securely to the study database. The study will also evaluate phenotype concordance with widely used HFpEF tools (H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF) and describe differences in physiological responses during CPET across phenotypes, to help clarify how useful they are in describing different forms of HFpEF. Analyses will emphasize exploratory, data-driven evaluation and estimation of effect sizes, consistent with the phenotyping objectives of the study. Where relevant, associations between phenotype membership and CPET variables will be explored descriptively and through correlation-based analyses. Ethical and data protection procedures are in place. Personal identifiers will be removed and replaced by study ID codes. A linkage file (study ID to personal identifiers) will be stored on an encrypted device with access restricted to the student investigator. Electronic study data will be housed on secure servers with role-based access control. Data will be retained according to institutional policy and relevant legislation. Only de-identified datasets will be used for analysis and sharing. Safety procedures for CPET include pre-test screening for absolute contraindications, continuous ECG and blood pressure monitoring during the test, availability of emergency equipment and immediate clinical oversight by qualified personnel. Adverse events during CPET will be recorded and reported per the Ethics Committee requirements. By combining clinical record information collected during previous hospitalizations with detailed exercise testing in a selected group, this study aims to provide new insight into the variation that exists among people with HFpEF. The findings may support more personalized approaches in future research.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Retropective observational phase (Phase I): * Age ≥18 years; * Established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%); * Patients receiving care (outpatient or inpatient) at the Local Health Unit of the Leiria Region (ULS RL) since September 2018. 2. Cross-sectional observational phase (Phase II - CPET): * Age ≥18 years; * Established diagnosis of HFpEF; * Selection as a volunteer representative of phenotypes identified in the retrospective clustering analysis; * Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
Exclusion criteria
1. Retropective observational phase (Phase I): * Incomplete or inadequate medical records preventing full data extraction. 2. Cross-sectional observational phase (Phase II - CPET): * Medical contraindication or physical inability to perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET); * Inability to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Identification and characterization of HFpEF phenotypes using multimodal clustering analysis | Up to December 2026 (completion of retrospective data collection and clustering analysis). | Identification of distinct phenotypic clusters in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using unsupervised machine learning applied to multimodal clinical, biochemical, imaging and functional data. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing | December 2026 to July 2027 (single assessment per participant). | Peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak), expressed in mL·kg-¹·min-¹, measured by breath-by-breath gas analysis during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and compared across HFpEF phenotypes. |
| Concordance between H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores and identified HFpEF phenotypes | Up to October 2027. | Assessment of concordance and discrimination performance of H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores in identifying phenotypes derived from data-driven clustering. |
| Mean plasma NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) by HFpEF phenotypes | Up to February 2028. | Comparison of plasma NT-proBNP concentrations (pg/mL) between HFpEF phenotypes identified by clustering analysis. |
Countries
Portugal
Contacts
ciTechCare - Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, Polytechnic of Leiria
ciTechCare - Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, Polytechnic of Leiria
Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon