Skip to content

INTREPID: A Study of Sapablursen Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Polycythemia Vera (PV)

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Global Study of Sapablursen in Polycythemia Vera

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07429266
Acronym
INTREPID
Enrollment
250
Registered
2026-02-24
Start date
2026-05-25
Completion date
2031-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polycythemia Vera

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sapablursen when added on to current standard of care (SOC) for Polycythemia Vera (PV) therapy. The study will be conducted in three sequential parts (Part 1a blinded treatment, Part 1b open-label treatment, & Part 2 long-term extension). Participants may receive treatment for up to 156 weeks.

Interventions

Administered subcutaneously (SC)

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Meet revised 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) and 2022 International Consensus Classification criteria for the diagnosis of PV. 2. Participants must be phlebotomy-dependent. 3. Hct less than (\<) 45% at study start. 4. Participants receiving Cytoreduction therapy (CRT) must be on a stable regimen at study start. 5. Adequate organ function and electrolytes.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior treatment of PV with Transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6) inhibitors, including sapablursen, or hepcidin mimetics. 2. Clinically significant thrombosis (eg, myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis or splenic vein thrombosis) within 1 month prior to randomization. 3. Participants who require phlebotomy at Hct levels \<45%. 4. Meet the criteria for post-PV myelofibrosis as defined by the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment. 5. Any serious or unstable medical condition or uncontrolled psychiatric condition that would interfere with their ability to comply with study requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants with Absence of Phlebotomy EligibilityWeek 20 through Week 32Response is defined as absence of phlebotomy eligibility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of PhlebotomiesWeek 0 through Week 32
Percentage of Participants with Hct ControlWeek 0 to Week 32Defined as all local laboratory Hct \<45% without phlebotomy.
Change from Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form Total T-scoreBaseline, Week 32
Change from Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Total Symptom Score (TSS)Baseline, Week 32
Percentage of Participants with Absence of Phlebotomy EligibilityWeek 20 through Week 52Response is defined as absence of phlebotomy eligibility.

Countries

Australia, Japan, United States

Contacts

CONTACTClinical Team
clinicaltrials@deciphera.com888-724-3274
STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Team

Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026