Skip to content

Plant-based Protein-rich Weight Loss Intervention in 55+ Adults With Obesity

Plant-based Protein-rich Weight Loss Intervention in 55+ Adults With Obesity

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07429136
Acronym
2EAT
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-02-24
Start date
2024-08-13
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Obesity, Ageing

Brief summary

The objective of the 2EAT RCT is to investigate whether a shift towards more plant-based (≥60% with a minimum of 50%) protein intake can be achieved in an energy restricted diet for three and six months in older adults (55+) with obesity. The 2EAT researchers developed a new dietary counseling plan for six months. This includes four individual consultations, five group meetings and three 24h-recalls. In these six months, participants receive dietary counseling focused on energy restriction (-500 kcal), higher protein intake (aim towards 1.2 g/kg/d, minimum of 0.8 g/kg/d). Participants are randomly allocated either to the more plant-based diet (≥60%) or the more animal-based diet (≥60%). At the start of the intervention, participants are provided with a workbook and recipe book. Secondary objectives are to assess the effect after three and six months 2EAT dietary treatment on 1) weight loss and 2) skeletal muscle mass. Exploratory objectives are to assess the effect after three and six months 2EAT dietary treatment on 1) physical health outcomes (muscle mass and physical performance), 2) body composition, 3) metabolic blood parameters, 4) vitality and quality of life, 5) nutritional intake, 6) behavioral changes, 7) evaluate the process of the dietary treatment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMore plant-based protein intake during weight loss

Participants receive dietary counseling for six months focusing on 1) energy restriction (-500 kcal), 2) higher protein intake (aim 1.2 g/kg/d, minimum 0.8 g/kg/d) and according to their assigned diet, either 3) more plant-based protein (≥60%) or more animal-based protein (≥60%).

Sponsors

Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are either assigned to the 1) more plant-based diet group, or the 2) more animal-based diet group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 55 or older * Are obese: have a BMI of \>30 kg/m2 or BMI \>27 kg/m2 and waist circumference \>88 cm (women) or \>102 cm (men) * Living independently (not in a health facility) * The willingness that the general practitioner will be notified of study participation * Written informed consent * Willingness to comply with the protocol * Consent of the study physician

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to understand the Dutch language * Cognitive impairment (MMSE \<15) * Use of total or partial parenteral nutrition (TPN) * Alcohol or drug abuse in the opinion of the investigator * Current enrolment in a fixed rehabilitation program or other intervention studies * Palliative treatment or a life expectancy of ≤ 3 months * Following a vegetarian or vegan (100% plant-based) diet * Bariatric surgery * Active medical treatment interfering with this intervention (e.g. weight loss medication as Ozempic, cancer patients receiving systemic and immune therapy) * Physical disabled: unable to meet the general daily exercise guideline for adults * Planned a holiday during the intervention period and is unable to attend group- or individual sessions for \> 3 weeks The health conditions below will be assessed by the study physician. When a condition interferes the dietary treatment or if the diet worsens the participants health it counts as

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of high plant-based protein intake while simultaneously striving for weight loss and increased protein intakeAt baseline (week 0), in week 13 (halfway), in week 26 (end), and optional follow-up (week 52)Three-day food record (plant protein intake as part of total protein intake; g/day)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of a weight loss diet during a more plant-based, higher protein intakeAt baseline (week 0), in week 13 (halfway), in week 26 (end), and optional follow-up (week 52)Three-day food record on energy (kcal/day)
Feasibility of an increased protein intake during a more plant-based protein, weight loss dietAt baseline (week 0), in week 13 (halfway), in week 26 (end), and optional follow-up (week 52)Three-day food record on protein intake (g/day)
Effect of 2EAT dietary treatment on weight lossAt baseline (week 0), in week 13 (halfway), in week 26 (end), and optional follow-up (week 52)Body weight in kg (calibrated weighing scales)
Effect of 2EAT dietary treatment on skeletal muscle massAt baseline (week 0), in week 13 (halfway), in week 26 (end), and optional follow-up (week 52)Skeletal muscle mass (appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) in kg) via a DXA-scan

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

CONTACTSusanne Wildemast
s.wildemast@hva.nl+31623492734
CONTACTSjors Verlaan
s.verlaan@hva.nl+31657442955
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPeter Weijs

Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026