Skip to content

Benefits of Physical Activity During the School Day to Reduce Mental Fatigue and Optimize Cognitive and Psychosocial Processes in Secondary School Students

Benefits of Physical Activity During the School Day to Reduce Mental Fatigue and Optimize Cognitive and Psychosocial Processes in Secondary School Students

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07427329
Acronym
MENTALFIT
Enrollment
434
Registered
2026-02-23
Start date
2025-09-29
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2026-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Behavior, Mental Fatigue, Physical Inactivity

Keywords

Mental Fatigue, Physical Activity, Educational Processes, Physically active lessons, Academic performance, Psychological Processes, Secondary Schools

Brief summary

The main aim of the MENTALFIT project is to test the effectiveness of physically active teaching methodologies to reduce mental fatigue and optimize cognitive, emotional, and motivational processes in secondary school students. Specifically, the study aims to examine differences depending on the type of physically active strategy implemented (physically active learning, active breaks, and active recesses) on students' mental fatigue, cognitive function, group dynamics, and motivational processes. Furthermore, the project aims to compare whether learning and academic performance are similar in traditional classes versus classes employing a physically active teaching methodology. Finally, a secondary objective of the project is to create and validate new instruments to assess the different psychobiological and educational processes included in this project.

Detailed description

Background and Rationale Mental Fatigue (MF) is a dynamic psychobiological state induced by prolonged cognitive and emotional demands. In educational contexts, particularly in secondary education, it manifests as a cascading deterioration affecting attention, executive function, emotional regulation, and learning capacity. Despite its relevance, MF remains understudied in adolescents. Secondary school students face substantial sedentary demands, spending an average of 78% of the school day in sedentary activities. These schedules, characterized by extended periods of continuous instruction with minimal breaks, create conditions conducive to MF development. The MENTALFIT project aims to address this by reintegrating movement into school routines to counteract MF and its associated cognitive decrements. Study Design and Methodology This quasi-experimental study (Study 3 of the MENTALFIT overarching protocol) employs a multifactorial design to evaluate the differential effectiveness of three physical activity (PA) interventions. The study is conducted over a full academic year (2024-2025) across several secondary schools in Extremadura, Spain. The sample comprises adolescents in their 3rd and 4th year of secondary education (aged 13-17). The sample is divided into four groups: one control group ("business as usual") and three experimental groups. To compare the effectiveness of different approaches, each experimental center implements three distinct physically active strategies in a counterbalanced rotation across the three trimesters. This ensures that each experimental group receives every type of intervention while controlling for order effects. Intervention Components The multicomponent intervention includes: Physically Active Lessons (PAL): Integrating motor activities with curriculum content. Active Breaks (AB): Short bouts of physical activity delivered between or during lessons. Active Recess (AR): Structured opportunities for physical activity during break times. Data Collection Data are collected at six measurement points throughout the academic year (at the beginning and end of each trimester). Assessments include standardized self-report measures evaluating mental fatigue perception, academic burnout, school engagement, academic motivation, and well-being. Furthermore, objective measures are collected, including academic grades (GPA), computerised neuropsychological batteries (Stroop, PASAT, PVT-B), continuous heart rate and physical activity monitoring via Fitbit devices, and brain activity via Electroencephalography (EEG) in a selected subsample to capture objective neural correlates of mental fatigue.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALActive breaks

AB are implemented three times per week on days without physical education classes, providing a total of six active break sessions weekly (two per day on intervention days). Each session consists of 5 minutes of physical activity scheduled after the second and fifth academic periods to interrupt prolonged sedentary behaviour. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the timing and implementation of activities.

PAL integrates physical movement into academic instruction. Two 55-minute lessons per week are dedicated to integrating motor activities with curriculum content. The intervention is coordinated by a specialised facilitator who co-designs the sessions with subject-matter teachers to maintain academic rigor while promoting physical engagement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester.

BEHAVIORALActive Recess

AR provides structured opportunities for physical activity during school breaks. Every day of the week, two activities are offered during recess: one involving moderate physical activity and another involving more vigorous or intense activity (alternative games). The intervention modifies playground spaces and provides diverse sports equipment to encourage movement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the implementation of the activities.

Sponsors

University of Extremadura
Lead SponsorOTHER
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study employs a multifactorial quasi-experimental design. The sample is divided into three experimental groups and one control group. Each experimental group receives a different physically active intervention (Physically Active Lessons, Active Breaks, and Active Recess) each trimester in a counterbalanced rotation across a full academic year. The control group maintains its regular academic schedule without additional interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolment in the 3rd or 4th year of compulsory secondary education (Educación Secundaria Obligatoria). * Attending one of the participating secondary schools. * Providing written informed consent from parents/guardians and verbal assent from the students.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical or physical inability to participate in the physically active interventions. * Refusal to participate or lack of parental consent. * Schools participating in any other physical activity or health promotion program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multidimensional Mental Fatigue (PedsQL MFS)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (Varni \& Limbers, 2008), 9-item Spanish version. It measures general, sleep/rest, and cognitive fatigue. A composite score is calculated as the mean across items. Higher scores indicate greater problems with fatigue.
Objective Neurophysiological Mental Fatigue (Brain Activity)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed via EEG recordings using Emotiv EPOC X headsets. Recordings are taken during resting-state and cognitive tasks (Stroop, PASAT, PVT-B) to characterize neural correlates (theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands) of cognitive performance under conditions of mental fatigue.
Objective Cardiovascular Indicators (Heart Rate and HRV)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).Fitbit Charge 6 devices worn continuously for one week at each measurement point to provide 24-hour assessments of heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) as indicators of fatigue and autonomic nervous system state.
Subjective Mental Fatigue (VAS-F)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year: beginning and end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed through the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F; Smith et al., 2019). It is a 100mm single-item measure of overall fatigue intensity. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a higher perception of mental fatigue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Performance (Neuropsychological Battery)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).A computerized battery assessing cognitive inhibition, selective attention, working memory, and sustained attention using three specific tasks: the Stroop task, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task-Brief (PVT-B).
Perceived Executive Functioning (WEBEX)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Perceived difficulties and efficacy in everyday executive functioning evaluated using the WEBEX Scale (Morea \& Calvete, 2020).
Academic Performance (GPA)Assessed at 3 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Grade point average (GPA) obtained from students' official academic records across all compulsory subjects.
Academic Burnout (MBI-SS)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (12 items). Comprises three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic efficacy. A composite burnout score is calculated.
School Engagement (UWES-S)Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed using 3 items from the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students measuring vigor, dedication, and absorption. Items are rated on a 7-point scale (0-6).
Perceived Mental LoadAssessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed using an adapted 3-item scale (Díaz-García et al., 2018) measuring perceived physical, cognitive, and emotional demands of the school week. Rated on an 11-point scale (0-10).
Motivation towards Exercise (BREQ-3)Assessed at 3 time points: beginning, middle, and end of the academic year (Months 0, 4.5, and 9).Assessed using 6 items representing the six regulation types of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4).
Classroom Social Dynamics (CCQ-SF)Assessed at 3 time points: at the end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Months 3, 6, and 9).Class Cohesion Questionnaire Short-Form (Leo et al., 2023) measuring task and social cohesion (6 items total).
Subjective Happiness (SHS)Assessed at 2 time points: beginning and end of the academic year (Month 0 and Month 9).Assessed using the Spanish adaptation of the Subjective Happiness Scale (Extremera \& Fernández-Berrocal, 2014).
Self-reported Screen TimeAssessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed separately for weekdays and weekends via a single question about hours spent on screens (TV, mobile, video games, social media). Rated on a 7-point scale ranging from "0 minutes" to "5 hours or more".
Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (KIDMED 2.0)Assessed at measurement point 5 (approximately Month 7.5 of the academic year).Assessed using the KIDMED 2.0 questionnaire (Spanish version; López-Gajardo et al., 2022) to evaluate adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Higher scores indicate better adherence to healthy dietary habits.
Objective Physical Activity and Sleep PatternsAssessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).Fitbit Charge 6 devices worn continuously for one week providing assessments of sleep metrics (duration, efficiency) and PA patterns (steps, intensity minutes, sedentary time).
Self-reported Physical Activity FrequencyAssessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed via a single-item question asking participants about their weekly physical activity volume (including PE classes and outside school). Rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "None" to "More than 7 hours".
Self-reported Sleep DurationAssessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).Assessed via a single-item question asking about the average hours of sleep per day (including night sleep and naps). Responses range from "Less than 3 hours" to "More than 10 hours".

Countries

Spain

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORInmaculada González-Ponce, PhD

University of Extremadura - Faculty of Teacher Training

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTomás García-Calvo, PhD

University of Extremadura - Faculty of Sport Science

STUDY_DIRECTORRosa Ayuso-Moreno, MSc

University of Extremadura - Faculty of Sport Science

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026