Fibrinogen Deficiency in Complex Cardiac Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
fibrinogen, cardiopulmonary bypass, pharmacokinetic modeling
Brief summary
Heart surgery is essential for many cardiovascular conditions, but it is a major operation with a significant mortality rate of around 4% in Europe. Among the main complications encountered postoperatively, hemorrhage occurs at a rate of around 8.2% for severe bleeding and 1.6% for massive bleeding. Hemorrhagic complications are caused by hemostasis disorders attributable to extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Despite recent advances in material design, ECG activates hemostasis, leading to the consumption of various coagulation factors, including fibrinogen, as well as the absorption of fibrinogen by the various components of the circuit. Postoperative hypofibrinogenemia has multiple causes and is correlated with the risk of bleeding and the need for red blood cell transfusions in cardiac surgery under CPB, and therefore indirectly with mortality related to this procedure. The administration of fibrinogen concentrates is the standard treatment; however, the optimal dose to normalize fibrinogen levels and reduce bleeding is unknown. Good practice recommendations in cardiac surgery suggest administering fibrinogen in cases of bleeding associated with fibrinogen levels below 2 g/L. However, the time required to obtain fibrinogen level results from the laboratory (approximately 1 hour) is not always compatible with the urgency of transfusion needs in these situations. Transfusion optimization strategies have been proposed using viscoelastic tests (ROTEM, Werfen, or Quantra, Stago, for example). The administration of fibrinogen guided by these tests has reduced the need for red blood cell transfusions; however, this strategy increases the cost attributable to fibrinogen because it favors its administration without individualizing the dose to be administered. To date, it is not possible to individualize the dose of fibrinogen to be administered based on baseline fibrinogen levels and kinetics. Developing such an administration strategy would allow for i) faster correction of hypofibrinogenemia and ii) a reduction in associated costs by administering the minimum effective dose.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALBlood samples for PK
Samples will be taken at regular intervals to characterize the kinetics of fibrinogen evolution post-transfusion. Sampling times will be at t = 0 (before transfusion), 10 minutes, H1, H3, H6, H9, H12, D1, and D2 relative to the start of fibrinogen transfusion (measurement of fibrinogen levels and viscoelastic tests), then every two days until the end of hospitalization (measurement of fibrinogen levels only).
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Laboratoires LFB
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult * Patient undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass * Indication for fibrinogen administration after cardiopulmonary bypass weaning * Patient affiliated with or entitled to social security coverage * Patient who has received informed consent about the study
Exclusion criteria
* Administration of fibrinogen in the context of massive transfusion * Contraindication to the administration of the fibrinogen concentrate under study * Constitutional afibrinogenemia, constitutional dysfibrinogenemia, or any other constitutional diseases related to hemostasis * Pregnant women, women in labor, breastfeeding women * Adults subject to legal protection measures (guardianship or curatorship) * Patients with preoperative anemia \< 6 g/dL * Patients with a life expectancy \< 24 hours * Patients who do not speak French * Refusal to participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Characterize the sources of variability in plasma fibrinogen levels in response to administration of fibrinogen concentrate after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. | During surgery (day 0) (before transfusion then at 10min, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours after transfusion) then at day 1, day 2, day 4 and day 6. | Measurement of blood samples using the Clauss technique |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Characterize the sources of variability in response to fibrinogen concentrate administration as assessed by the ROTEM viscoelastic test. | During surgery (day 0) (before transfusion then at 10min, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours after transfusion) then at day 1 and day 2. | Measurement of blood samples using the ROTEM viscoelastic test |
| Characterize the sources of variability in response to fibrinogen concentrate administration as assessed by the Quantra viscoelastic test. | During surgery (day 0) (before transfusion then at 10min, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours after transfusion) then at day 1 and day 2. | measurement of blood samples using the Quantra viscoelastic test |
| Characterize the correlation between fibrinogen exposure and postoperative bleeding after fibrinogen administration. | During surgery (day 0) then at day 1 and day 2. | Blood loss in ml measured via surgical drains |
| Study the relationship between different estimators of fibrinogen concentration. | through study completion, an average of 7 days | Correlation coefficient between the different estimators of fibrinogen concentration and description using a Bland-Altman plot. |
Countries
France
Contacts
CONTACTJulien LANOISELEE, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJulien LANOISELEE, MD
CHU de Saint-Etienne
Outcome results
None listed