Skip to content

Comparing the Effects of Ischemic Compression and Kinesiology Taping Techniques

Comparing the Effects of Ischemic Compression and Kinesiology Taping Techniques in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07425301
Enrollment
102
Registered
2026-02-20
Start date
2024-11-03
Completion date
2025-12-02
Last updated
2026-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Chronic Low Back Pain, Kinesiological Taping, Conservative Treatment, Ischemic Compression

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effects of ischemic compression and kinesiology taping techniques on pain intensity and lumbar range of motion in individuals with chronic low back pain. Participants are assigned to one of three groups: a conventional treatment group, a conventional treatment plus kinesiology taping group, or a conventional treatment plus ischemic compression group. Interventions are administered over a three-week period. Outcome measures are assessed before and after the intervention using standardized assessment methods. The purpose is to compare changes among groups and examine the effects of adding these techniques to conventional treatment.

Detailed description

Chronic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with pain, reduced mobility, and functional limitations. Nonpharmacological interventions are frequently used to support symptom management and improve physical function. Manual therapy techniques and supportive therapeutic applications are commonly included in rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic low back pain. This study is designed to investigate the effects of ischemic compression and kinesiology taping techniques in individuals with chronic low back pain. Participants are assigned to different intervention groups receiving either conventional treatment alone or conventional treatment combined with additional therapeutic techniques. Interventions are delivered according to structured protocols over a defined treatment period. Outcome measures evaluate changes in pain intensity and lumbar range of motion using standardized assessment methods.

Interventions

Conventional treatment consists of standard physiotherapy modalities administered according to a structured protocol during scheduled sessions over a three-week period.

PROCEDUREKinesiology Taping

Kinesiology taping is applied using standardized techniques by a trained therapist according to a structured application protocol during the treatment period.

Ischemic compression therapy is a manual technique applied by a therapist using sustained pressure to targeted areas according to a structured treatment protocol during scheduled sessions.

Sponsors

Hasan Kalyoncu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to one of three parallel groups: a conventional treatment group, a conventional treatment plus kinesiology taping group, or a conventional treatment plus ischemic compression group. All groups are followed over the same study period, and outcomes are assessed before and after the intervention to compare changes among groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Volunteers willing to participate in the study, * Those who have had back pain for at least 12 weeks, * Those who have been tested with a test patch and have no allergy to kinesiology tape, * Patients who can comply with the exercise programme to be applied were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have undergone surgery for back pain, * Pregnant women, * Patients with rheumatological diseases were not included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention periodPain intensity is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, a validated measure consisting of a scale ranging from no pain to worst imaginable pain. Change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lumbar Flexion Range of MotionBaseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention periodLumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility. Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
Change in Lumbar Extension Range of MotionBaseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention periodLumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility. Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
Change in Lumbar Right Lateral Flexion Range of MotionBaseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention periodLumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility. Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
Change in Lumbar Left Lateral Flexion Range of MotionBaseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention periodLumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility. Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORIlker Demir, PhD

Inonu University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026