Skip to content

Comparison of Two Needle Agitation Strategies in Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for Diagnostic Yield

A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial Comparing Two Needle Agitation Strategies During Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Diagnostic Yield in Patients With Enlarged Mediastinal Lymph Nodes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07424807
Enrollment
180
Registered
2026-02-20
Start date
2026-02-16
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Keywords

EBUS-TBNA, Needle Agitation, Tissue Core Length, Specimen Adequacy, Mediastinal Lymph Nodes, Randomized Controlled Trial, diagnostic yield

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the number of needle agitations during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) affects diagnostic yield in patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. The study will also evaluate tissue sample quality and the safety of different needle agitation strategies. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the number of needle agitations improve diagnostic yield? Does a higher number of needle agitations increase tissue core length and specimen adequacy? Are there differences in procedure-related complications between the two needle agitation strategies? Researchers will compare two needle agitation strategies during EBUS-TBNA to see if one approach provides better diagnostic performance, improved sample quality, and similar procedural safety. Participants will: * Undergo EBUS-TBNA as part of their clinical evaluation * Be randomly assigned to one of two needle agitation strategies * Have tissue samples measured for core length and assessed for diagnostic adequacy * Be monitored for procedure-related complications

Detailed description

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the standard minimally invasive modality for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with suspected thoracic malignancies and benign lymphadenopathies. Despite its widespread adoption and high overall diagnostic performance, variability in procedural techniques may contribute to heterogeneity in specimen quality and diagnostic yield. Among procedural factors, the number of needle agitations performed during each needle pass represents a modifiable technical variable that may influence tissue acquisition. Increased needle agitation may theoretically enhance tissue yield and core length by promoting mechanical dissection of nodal tissue; however, excessive agitation may also increase blood contamination, reduce sample interpretability, or elevate procedural trauma risk. Conversely, fewer agitations may limit tissue disruption but potentially result in inadequate sampling. Currently, there is no high-level evidence establishing an optimal agitation strategy, and operator-dependent variability remains common in clinical practice. This randomized, single-blind controlled trial is designed to compare two predefined needle agitation strategies during EBUS-TBNA. By standardizing all other procedural variables, the study aims to isolate the effect of agitation number on diagnostic performance. Objective procedural metrics, including measured tissue core length and specimen adequacy, will be systematically assessed to provide quantitative evaluation of sample quality. Procedural safety outcomes will also be monitored to evaluate whether differences in agitation strategy influence complication rates. The results of this trial are expected to provide evidence-based data to support technical standardization of EBUS-TBNA and to inform procedural guidelines aimed at optimizing diagnostic efficiency while maintaining safety.

Interventions

PROCEDURENeedle Agitation Strategy During EBUS-TBNA

The intervention consists of modifying the number of needle agitations performed during each needle pass in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Participants are randomized to one of two predefined agitation strategies: a low-range strategy (10 to fewer than 30 agitations per pass, target approximately 20) or a high-range strategy (30 to 60 agitations per pass, target approximately 45 to 50). All other procedural variables, including needle type, number of passes, suction technique, and specimen handling, are standardized.

Sponsors

Phan Quang Hieu
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The pathologists evaluating the tissue specimens will be blinded to group allocation. Participants will not be informed of the assigned needle agitation strategy.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two needle agitation strategies during EBUS-TBNA. All other procedural steps will be standardized.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Presence of enlarged mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes requiring diagnostic evaluation on chest computed tomography (CT), defined as short-axis diameter ≥ 10 mm measured on axial images * Clinical indication for EBUS-TBNA * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Uncorrected coagulation disorders (platelet count \< 100,000/mm³; International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5; or prothrombin time \< 50% of control) * Acute myocardial infarction within the preceding 4 weeks or ongoing unstable angina * Significant upper airway obstruction (benign or malignant) with ≥ 50% reduction in tracheal lumen diameter * Hemodynamic instability (e.g., persistent hypotension, significant arrhythmia, or need for vasopressors) * Respiratory failure refractory to oxygen therapy, defined as sustained Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) ≤ 90% despite supplemental oxygen * Intractable cough precluding bronchoscopy * History of severe allergy to local anesthetics or sedative agents used during the procedure * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Yield of EBUS-TBNAWithin 7-14 days after the procedureProportion of cases in which EBUS-TBNA provides a definitive histopathological diagnosis based on tissue specimens obtained during the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tissue Core LengthImmediately after the procedureMeasured length of the tissue core specimen obtained during EBUS-TBNA, recorded in centimeters immediately after specimen collection.

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

CONTACTHieu Q Phan, MD, M.Sc.
hieu.pq@umc.edu.vn+84907718538

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026