Skip to content

Comparison of Mobile Application and Traditional Methods in Classification

Comparison of Mobile Application and Traditional Methods in Classification of Periodontitis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07424612
Acronym
CMATMCPP:ACS
Enrollment
122
Registered
2026-02-20
Start date
2024-11-20
Completion date
2025-12-25
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Disease (Diagnosis)

Keywords

classification, mobile application, periodontitis

Brief summary

In this study, periodontal disease classifications of patients with periodontitis were performed using a mobile application and conventional methods. A total of 122 patients with periodontitis who presented to the Periodontology Clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry at Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University were included in the study. The classification of periodontitis was carried out according to the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions and the EFP S3-level clinical practice guideline. In the study, periodontal classification of 122 patients with periodontitis was performed using a mobile application (Peribrain) by a student, a clinical student (manual), and a clinician (manual). In the mobile application, the following parameters were assessed: age, presence of diabetes, smoking status, deepest periodontal pocket depth, interproximal attachment loss, tooth loss, furcation defects, bite collapse, tooth migration, radiographic interproximal bone loss (%), and vertical bone loss. For classification, plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level were measured in the patients. The results of the three groups were compared with each other.

Interventions

Periodontal classifications performed manually and using a mobile application were compared.

Sponsors

Tuğba ŞAHİN
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged between 18 and 65 years who were diagnosed with periodontitis * Participants did not have any intellectual disabilities

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with intellectual disability * Individuals with severe suicidal tendency * Individuals with dementia * Individuals with psychosis * Individuals receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy * Pregnant or lactating individuals Individuals who had received periodontal treatment within the past six months Individuals currently using antibiotics Individuals with uncontrolled systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periodontal classificationBaselineDetermination of the stage and grade of periodontitis according to the latest classification.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
periodontal pocket depth (PPD)BaselinePeriodontal pocket depth measured in millimeters using a Williams periodontal probe. The distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket was recorded at each site.
Bleeding on probing (BOP)BaselineBleeding on probing assessed using a periodontal probe. After gently inserting the probe into the gingival sulcus and moving it laterally along the pocket wall, bleeding was recorded as present (+) or absent (-).pocket and gently moved laterally along the pocket wall. + is maximum and - is minimum. + indicates a worse outcome.
Plaque index (PI)BaselineOral hygiene status assessed using the Plaque Index, which measures dental plaque accumulation adjacent to the gingival margin. Scores range from 0 (no plaque) to 3 (abundant plaque), with higher scores indicating poorer oral hygiene.
Gingival index (GI)BaselineGingival inflammation assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index. Each site was scored on a 0-3 scale, where 0 = normal gingiva and 3 = severe inflammation with edema, redness, and spontaneous bleeding. Higher scores indicate worsening gingival inflammation.
Clinical attachment level (CAL)BaselineClinical attachment level measured in millimeters using a periodontal probe. CAL was calculated as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and used to assess periodontal tissue support loss.
Gingival recession (GR)BaselineGingival recession is the apical migration of the gingival margin away from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), resulting in the exposure of the root surface of a tooth.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026