Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Midodrine for Control and Prevention of Ascites and Its Related Complications in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.

Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Midodrine for Control and Prevention of Ascites and Its Related Complications in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07422948
Enrollment
113
Registered
2026-02-20
Start date
2026-02-05
Completion date
2027-08-30
Last updated
2026-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure

Brief summary

Ascites is a cardinal and debilitating complication in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), significantly correlating with disease severity and poor prognosis. The underlying pathophysiology is driven by severe splanchnic arterial vasodilation, which reduces effective arterial blood volume and triggers compensatory neurohumoral activation. This cascade leads to profound sodium retention, renal vasoconstriction, and circulatory instability. Consequently, patients with ACLF frequently experience diuretic intolerance and are at elevated risk for severe complications, including electrolyte disturbances, acute kidney injury (AKI), and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Current management strategies rely heavily on diuretics and albumin; however, the efficacy of diuretics is often limited by systemic hypotension and pre-existing renal impairment, leading to frequent treatment failure or diuretic-induced complications. Existing clinical guidelines lack definitive recommendations regarding the preemptive use of vasoconstrictors to stabilize hemodynamics before ascites becomes refractory. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 adrenergic agonist, targets this circulatory dysfunction by increasing systemic vascular resistance and improving renal perfusion. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the early initiation of midodrine in achieving better control of ascites and preventing the progression to renal complications in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Interventions

DRUGMidodrine

Start with 5 mg TDS. Increase 2.5 mg every day with target MAP increase of 10 mmHg, maximum upto 15 mg TDS.

OTHERStandard Medical Treatment

1. Sodium restriction to ≤5 g/day. 2. Combination of spironolactone 50 mg + furosemide 20 mg daily as a fixed dose. a) Stepwise titration every 3 days if tolerated, with careful monitoring for AKI, hyponatremia, encephalopathy. Dose reduction or discontinuation if diuretic-related complications develop. 3. Other supportive measures: as per the clinician 1. Lactulose ± rifaximin for hepatic encephalopathy prophylaxis/management. 2. IV albumin during LVP 3. Antibiotic prophylaxis/treatment as indicated for SBP or systemic infections. 4. Correction of electrolytes and renal support as needed. 5. Management of precipitating factors (alcohol, infection, flare of hepatitis, GI bleed, etc.).

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years. 2. ACLF 3. Ascites (Grade II/III). 4. Willing/able for salt restriction, labs, urine collections, and follow-ups; consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

1. SCr ≥ 1.5 mg/dL OR ongoing AKI \>stage I 2. Persistent or uncorrectable severe hyponatremia (Na ≤120 mEq/L), hyperkalemia (\>6.0 mEq/L) or any other critical electrolyte imbalance. 3. Refractory ascites 4. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis 5. Hepatic encephalopathy grade II-III. 6. Shock, need for IV vasopressors, SBP \<90 mmHg or MAP \<65 despite fluids/albumin. 7. Active GI bleed, uncontrolled infection/sepsis, or SBP at screening. 8. Severe cardiomyopathy, critical valvular disease, arrhythmias contraindicating α-agonists. 9. ACLF patients on Mechanical ventilation/ICU/ionotropes/High flow oxygen 10. Pregnancy, lactation. 11. Hypersensitivity/intolerance to midodrine. 12. Significant LUTS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with no ascites between the two groups at day 28.Day 28

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients with no ascitesDay 7 & 14
Partial ascites response7,14,28 days
Absent response or worsening of ascites28 day
Large Volume Paracentesis requirement in two groupsday 7 and 28
Cumulative dose of diuretics/Albumin/midodrine/carvedilolday 28
Change in Intra Abdominal pressure measured by manometer between both groupsDay 7
Change in MAP between both groups.7 days, then day 14 and 28
Change in Weight change between both groups.7 days, then day 14 and 28
Change in urine output daily between both groups7 days, then day 14 and 28
Change in HR between both groups7 days, then day 14 and 28
Change in urine Naday 3, 7 and 28 from baseline
Change in MELD score between both groups.day 4, 7 and 28
Change in AARC score between both groups.day 4, 7 and 28
Reduction in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient between both groups.14 and 28 days.
Mortalityday 28
New onset AKI between both groups.day 28
New onset SBP between both groupsday 28
New onset AKI, SBP, HE, Hyponatremia, shock and need for MVday 28
New onset HE between both groupsday 28
New onset Hyponatremia between both groups.day 28
New onset shock between both groups.day 28
New onset need for MV between both groupsday 28
Treatment related adverse effectsday 28

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTDr Chunnee Zangmu Bhutia, MD
czb.cr7@gmail.com01146300000
CONTACTDr Ankur S Jindal, DM
ankur.jindal3@gmail.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026