Skip to content

Silac Versus Phenol for the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Silac and Phenol Treatments in Primary Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-up

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07420452
Acronym
SILPHEN26
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-02-19
Start date
2026-02-12
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Keywords

Pilonidal Sinus Disease, SiLac, Phenol, Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus

Brief summary

Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition affecting young adults and is associated with pain, infection, and reduced quality of life. Various minimally invasive treatment options have been developed to reduce recurrence and improve recovery time. Among these methods, Silac (laser ablation) and phenol application are frequently used techniques. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of Silac and phenol treatments in patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either Silac or phenol treatment. The primary outcome of the study is recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, healing time, time to return to work, patient satisfaction, and treatment cost. Patient recruitment is planned over a 6-month period, and each participant will be followed for 6 months after treatment. The total study duration will be 12 months. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence to guide the selection of minimally invasive treatment options for primary pilonidal sinus disease.

Detailed description

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition commonly affecting young adults and is associated with significant morbidity, including pain, recurrent infections, and impaired quality of life. Minimally invasive treatment approaches have gained popularity in recent years in order to reduce postoperative pain, shorten recovery time, and lower recurrence rates compared to conventional excisional surgery. Silac (laser ablation of the sinus tract) and phenol application are two minimally invasive techniques currently used in the management of primary pilonidal sinus disease. Although both methods are widely practiced, high-quality comparative evidence regarding their relative effectiveness remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare Silac and phenol treatments in patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease. Eligible patients aged 18-64 years with primary disease, a maximum of three pits, and no more than two prior abscess episodes will be included. Patients with recurrent or secondary disease and significant comorbidities will be excluded. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Silac or phenol treatment. The primary outcome measure is recurrence rate during follow-up. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), wound healing time, time to return to work, patient satisfaction, and cost analysis. Patient recruitment will be conducted over a 6-month period. Each participant will be followed for 6 months after treatment, resulting in a total study duration of 12 months. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at p \< 0.05.

Interventions

PROCEDURESiLac (Laser Ablation)

Laser ablation of the pilonidal sinus tract performed according to the study protocol.

PROCEDUREPhenol Application

Chemical ablation with phenol performed according to the study protocol.

Sponsors

Izmir City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 64 years * Diagnosis of primary pilonidal sinus disease * Maximum of three sinus openings (pits) * History of no more than two previous abscess episodes * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent or previously operated pilonidal sinus disease * More than three sinus openings * More than two previous abscess episodes * Acute abscess requiring emergency drainage at presentation * Presence of significant uncontrolled comorbidities * Pregnancy * Inability to comply with follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence Rate6 monthRecurrence of pilonidal sinus disease defined as the presence of a new sinus opening, discharge, abscess formation, or need for additional surgical intervention during follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain (VAS Score)Postoperative day 1 and week 1Postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Postoperative Analgesic ConsumptionWithin the first postoperative weekUse of analgesic medication after treatment, measured as the proportion of patients requiring analgesics and/or the total number of analgesic doses used during the early postoperative period.
Wound Healing TimeUp to 6 monthsTime required for complete epithelialization of the treated area without discharge.
Wound-Related ComplicationsWithin 6 months after treatmentOccurrence of wound-related complications, including infection, abscess formation, cellulitis, seroma/hematoma, prolonged discharge (\>30 days), or need for additional medical or surgical intervention. Early (≤30 days) and late (\>30 days to 6 months) complications will be recorded separately.
Time to Return to WorkWithin 6 months after treatmentNumber of days from treatment to return to normal daily activities or work.
Patient SatisfactionAt 6 months after treatmentPatient-reported satisfaction with treatment outcome assessed using a standardized satisfaction scale.
Treatment CostDuring the 6-month follow-up periodDirect medical costs associated with each treatment method.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTMehmet A Ugur
mehmet.alperen.ugur@gmail.com+905345839945

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026