Skip to content

Intra Oral Appliance (IOA) Model Evaluating the Efficacy of Sensitive Toothpaste

Intra Oral Appliance (IOA) Model Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Dentifrices on Enamel Lesion Remineralization

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07419763
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-19
Start date
2025-04-15
Completion date
2025-06-10
Last updated
2026-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Brief summary

This single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover in situ study evaluated the enamel remineralization potential and fluoride bioavailability of three dentifrices: a fluoride-free negative control, a positive control with 0.243% sodium fluoride, and an investigational dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride, 5.0% potassium nitrate (KNO₃), and 20% sodium bicarbonate. Adult subjects wore acrylic palatal appliances containing demineralized enamel specimens for three 7-day treatment periods, each preceded by a 5-day fluoride-free washout. Primary outcomes were percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and enamel fluoride concentration.

Detailed description

This in situ intraoral appliance (IOA) model evaluates anticaries potential by exposing demineralized enamel specimens to oral conditions while allowing for ex vivo treatment assessments. Subjects wore acrylic palatal appliances containing four enamel specimens covered with steel gauze to promote plaque formation. Each of the three treatment periods lasted seven days and included twice-daily toothbrushing and dentifrice slurry swishing, plus three daily sucrose challenges. A minimum 5-day fluoride-free washout preceded each period. Post-treatment specimens were analyzed for %SMHR and enamel fluoride concentration.

Interventions

Fluoride-free toothpaste

DRUGActive Comparator

Commercially available fluoride toothpaste

Investigational fluoride toothpaste

Sponsors

Church & Dwight Company, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥18 years * Good general and oral health * Normal unstimulated saliva flow (≥1.5 mL unstimulated saliva in 5 minutes) * ≥16 teeth and functional maxillary dentition to support palatal appliance * Agree to abstain from other oral care products and preventive dental procedures during study * No advanced periodontal disease, no visible untreated caries * If female, not pregnant or breastfeeding (self-reported) * No significant oral soft tissue pathology; no peri/oral piercings; no removable partial dentures * No antibiotics or immunosuppressives within 30 days of screening * No palatal torus; no medical condition that would interfere with safety * No allergy or significant adverse events to impression materials, acrylics, or common oral product

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to tolerate appliance or comply with procedures * Oral pathology that interferes with participation * Use of fluoride toothpaste during washout periods * Participation in another appliance study within the last 4 week

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR)End of each 7-day test period (three periods total)
Enamel Fluoride Concentration (EFU)End of each 7-day test period (three periods total)Post-treatment enamel fluoride concentration (µg F/cm³)

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORAnnahita Ghassemi, PhD

Church & Dwight, Inc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026