Skip to content

"Effect of Albumin Combined With Furosemide in Critically Ill Patients With Fluid Overload: Impact on Urine Output and Renal Function"

"Comparison of Furosemide Versus Albumin Plus Furosemide in Increasing Urine Output in Critically Ill Patients: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial"

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07417969
Acronym
FANTASTIC
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-02-18
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2026-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urine Output Decreased

Keywords

furosemide, albumin, fluid overload, diuretics, urine output

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of furosemide alone versus the combination of furosemide plus albumin in critically ill adult patients with fluid overload. The trial evaluates whether co-administration of albumin enhances diuretic response compared with standard furosemide therapy. The primary outcomes include urine output at 2 hours, changes in renal perfusion markers, and biochemical parameters. Secondary outcomes include changes in mean arterial pressure, electrolyte balance, and renal resistance index. The study seeks to determine whether adding albumin provides a clinically meaningful improvement in diuresis and renal function compared with furosemide monotherapy.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical study evaluates two diuretic strategies for fluid overload in adult critically ill patients: furosemide monotherapy versus combined therapy with furosemide plus albumin. Albumin may enhance diuretic effectiveness by increasing intravascular oncotic pressure, improving renal perfusion, and facilitating drug delivery to the nephron. The protocol includes standardized dosing, measurement of urine output at 2 hours, and analysis of serum and urine biochemical parameters. Bedside ultrasound will be used to assess markers of fluid overload, including evaluation of the inferior vena cava and venous congestion patterns. Hemodynamic variables, electrolyte changes, and estimated glomerular filtration rate will also be monitored. The study aims to determine whether the co-administration of albumin provides a clinically meaningful improvement in diuretic response and renal function compared with furosemide monotherapy in critically ill patients with fluid overload.

Interventions

DRUGFurosemide plus albumin

Furosemide 1 mg/kg IV administered together with 50 grams of 25% albumin (one vial), infused over 30 minutes.

Furosemide 1 mg/kg IV as a single dose, infused over 30 minutes, plus placebo (normal saline).

Sponsors

Jose J Zaragoza, MD MSc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study uses a double-blind design. Both participants and care providers are masked to treatment allocation. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either furosemide 1 mg/kg plus placebo or furosemide 1 mg/kg plus 50 g of intravenous albumin. An independent staff member prepares the study solutions in identical opaque containers with equal volumes to preserve blinding. Clinical evaluations, including urine output measurement at 2 hours and bedside ultrasound assessment of fluid overload, are performed without revealing the assigned group. Blinding is maintained throughout the study until data collection is complete and the database is locked.

Intervention model description

This study uses a randomized, parallel-group design in which participants are assigned to one of two treatment arms: furosemide monotherapy or the combination of furosemide plus albumin. Each participant receives only one intervention throughout the study. Urine output is measured at 2 hours after administration, along with serum and urine biochemical markers, hemodynamic variables, and bedside ultrasound indicators of fluid overload. These outcomes are compared between groups to evaluate differences in diuretic response and renal function.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults ≥ 18 years of age admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) without mechanical ventilation. Patients for whom diuretic therapy will be initiated for the first time during the ICU stay due to clinical signs of fluid overload, as determined by the treating physician.

Exclusion criteria

Patients or family members who refuse participation in the study. Patients receiving palliative care. Patients with kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Patients currently participating in another clinical research protocol. Patients with clinical evidence of hypovolemia or dehydration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urine output at 2 hours2 hours after administration of the study treatment.Urine output measured in milliliters at 2 hours after administration of the assigned treatment (furosemide alone or furosemide plus albumin). Measurement performed with standard urine collection devices by blinded staff.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultrasound assessment of fluid overloadbaseline to 2 hoursBedside ultrasound evaluation of fluid overload, including inferior vena cava diameter and venous congestion patterns.
Electrolyte changes (Na, K, Cl)Baseline to 24 hours.Change in serum sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations from baseline to 24 hours.
Change in serum creatinineBaseline to 24 hours.Change in serum creatinine from baseline to 24 hours after administration of the assigned treatment.

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

CONTACTAlina Elizabeth Arechiga Casas, MD
alieliac26@gmail.com+52 8781360564

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026