Skip to content

INcreTin-based thERapies for Cardiovascular Event PrevenTion in Patients With and Without ASCVD (INTERCEPT-ASCVD)

Comparative Effectiveness of Dulaglutide, Semaglutide, and Tirzepatide in Preventing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity With or Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07417618
Acronym
INTERCEPT
Enrollment
60000
Registered
2026-02-18
Start date
2026-01-27
Completion date
2026-06-19
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ASCVD, Overweight, Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Detailed description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits of the modern incretin therapies semaglutide and tirzepatide in selected populations. SUSTAIN-6 (NCT01720446) and SURPASS-CVOT (NCT04255433) showed reductions in cardiovascular events with semaglutide and tirzepatide among patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk, findings that were also replicated in clinical practice settings (NCT06659744, NCT07088718). The REWIND trial (NCT01394952) demonstrated similar cardiovascular efficacy for dulaglutide and suggested benefit in both patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease.4 These findings raise the broader question of whether cardiovascular benefits of modern incretin therapies extend to individuals without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) when used in routine clinical practice. To address this question, this comparative effectiveness study using a target trial emulation framework will assess the incretin therapies dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin (used as an active comparator placebo proxy) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and overweight with or without ASCVD. Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, measurements of key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were designed to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice. The database analyses will be new-user active-comparative studies, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin on preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular events.

Interventions

DRUGDulaglutide

Initiation of dulaglutide dispensing claim is used as the exposure.

DRUGSemaglutide

Initiation of semaglutide dispensing claim is used as the exposure.

DRUGTirzepatide

Initiation of tirzepatide dispensing claim is used as the exposure.

DRUGSitagliptin

Initiation of sitagliptin dispensing claim is used as the reference.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

The database analyses will be new-user active-comparative studies, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin on preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. Optum: Eligible cohort entry period from September 18, 2014 to August 31, 2025. Marketscan: Eligible cohort entry from October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2023. Medicare: Eligible cohort entry from September 18, 2014 to October 31, 2020. POPULATION WITH ASCVD Inclusion Criteria: * History of ASCVD (defined as MI, ACS, stable/unstable angina surgical or percutaneous coronary/other arterial revascularization procedure, ischemic stroke, TIA, aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease) * BMI \>= 25.0kg/m2 * Type 2 Diabetes

Exclusion criteria

* Medullary thyroid carcinoma * MEN syndrome type 2 * Malignancy * Type 1 diabetes or secondary diabetes * End-stage renal disease or dialysis * Uncontrolled diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy * Pregnancy * Bariatric surgery * Prior use of pramlintide, or any GLP-1RA except injectable semaglutide/tirzepatide/dulaglutide, or any DPP4i except sitagliptin * CV-event or intervention * Concurrent use of both study drugs POPULATION WITHOUT ASCVD Inclusion Criteria: * BMI \>=25.0kg/m2 * Type 2 diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, or stroke (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction or stroke in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, or stroke (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction or stroke in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial infarction (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of myocardial infarction in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Stroke (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of stroke in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
All-cause mortality (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of all-cause mortality in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Unstable angina (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of unstable angina in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Coronary revascularization (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of coronary revascularization in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Hospitalization for heart failure (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Time to first hospitalization for any cause (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of time to first hospitalization for any cause in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Myocardial infarction (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of myocardial infarction in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Stroke (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of stroke in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
All-cause mortality (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of all-cause mortality in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (without ASCVD).Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Unstable angina (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of unstable angina in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Coronary revascularization (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of coronary revascularization in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Hospitalization for heart failure (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Time to first hospitalization for any cause (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of time to first hospitalization for any cause in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Urinary tract infections (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of urinary tract infections in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Serious infections (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of serious infections in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Gastrointestinal adverse events (with ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of gastrointestinal adverse events in individuals with T2DM and overweight with ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Urinary tract infections (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of urinary tract infections in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Serious infections (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of serious infections in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.
Gastrointestinal adverse events (without ASCVD)Through study completion until first of outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA or DPP4iHazard ratio of the safety outcome of gastrointestinal adverse events in individuals with T2DM and overweight without ASCVD, comparing dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShirley Wang, PhD, ScM

Brigham and Women's Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNils Krüger, MD

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026