Skip to content

To Explore the Surgical Outcomes and Safety of an Innovative Laparoscopic Uterine Pectopexy Technique Using Inverted T-meshes for Simultaneous Apical and Anterior Vaginal Repair.

One-year Outcomes of an Innovative Laparoscopic Pectopexy Procedure Using Inverted T-mesh for Treatment of Advanced Uterine and Anterior Vaginal Prolapse.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07411898
Enrollment
67
Registered
2026-02-17
Start date
2020-08-26
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pectopexy, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery, Sacrocolpopexy

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse, Pectopexy, Sacrocolpopexy

Brief summary

Patients referred for pelvic reconstructive surgery frequently present with combined anterior and apical vaginal wall prolapse. Previous studies found that anterior compartment involvement is the most common and serious defect that occurs with an apical defect. To address this, many surgeons will conduct concomitant surgeries in addition to sacrocolpopexy or pectopexy. This prospective pilot study was conducted to explore the surgical outcomes and safety of an innovative laparoscopic uterine pectopexy technique using inverted T-meshes for simultaneous apical and anterior vaginal repair.

Interventions

Laparoscopic pectopexy with inverted T-mesh for concomitant apical and anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with double mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair

Sponsors

Chung Shan Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presentation with a symptomatic uterine prolapse ≧ POP-Q stage 2 in patients who wished to retain the uterus

Exclusion criteria

* No known uterine or cervical pathology, no previous prolapse mesh repair, and no diseases known to affect bladder or bowel function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Anatomical Outcome1 year post-operationAnatomic outcomes were assessed by evaluating the pre- and post-operative prolapse stages as evaluated by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The plane of the hymen was defined as zero, all measures are in centimeters proximal (negative number) and distal (positive number) to the hymen. The more positive the number, the more severe the prolapse.
Rate of distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms1 year post-operationThese outcomes were assessed pre- and post-operation via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Higher scores indicated greater symptom distress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of surgical complications1 year post-operationComplications arising from the hospital or operative course
Rate of Reoperations1 year post-operationThe number of reoperations that were needed due to the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse found within 1 year post-operation

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026