Functionality, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Platelet-Rich Plasma
Conditions
Keywords
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Exercise, Pain, Functionality
Brief summary
Background Shoulder impingement syndrome is the most common disorder of the shoulder. Study results on the effectiveness of treatment options are inconclusive and limited. Therefore, more evidence is needed for long-term results Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the ideal physiotherapy protocol (IPRP-PT) applied after platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on pain and functionality in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, and to propose an alternative treatment protocol. Methods The study was performed in 54 patients with shoulder impingement syndrome who were injected with PRP. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. For 21 days, the study group received IPRP-PT study protocol, conventional physiotherapy and home exercise programme, while the control group received only conventional physiotherapy programme. Normal range of motion, muscle strength and posture were assessed. In addition, short form Mc-gill (SF-MPQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Constant Murley Shoulder Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA), were used.
Interventions
All patients included in the study were educated about the correct posture in daily life, sleeping position, and the things to be followed to improve the quality of life. In addition to 2 cc anticoagulant citrate dextrose withdrawn syringe, 20 cc of blood was taken by the nurse from the patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome. After the blood was transferred to a special PRP kit and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 8-9 minutes, the platelet-rich plasma portion remaining at the top of the kit was taken into the syringe and applied to the 1/3 posterolateral 1/3 of the glenohumeral joint by the physician. After PRP injections, evaluations of the study and control groups were performed before and after 21 days of treatment. The study group received IPRP-PT study protocol, conventional physiotherapy and home exercises, while the control group received only conventional physiotherapy and home programme.
It was applied once a day for 21 days to 54 patients included in the study. Ultrasound; Enraf Nonius Sonopuls692V® device was applied around the glenohumeral joint with an average treatment dose of 3 MHz, N 1.5 w/cm² and 8 minutes. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS); Enraf Nonius Sonopuls 692V® device was applied to the glenohumeral joint with a frequency between 60-120 Hz and a transition time of 50-100 µsec for 20 min. Hot Pack; It was applied to the glenohumeral joint for 20 minutes (Kuhn, 2009; Kul and Ugur, 2019; Walsh, Howe, Johnson, and Sluka, 2009).
OTHERIPRP-PT Study Protocol
IPRP-PT study protocol was applied in addition to conventional physiotherapy for 21 days in 27 patients who underwent PRP injection in our study group. The exercises were performed once a day with a physiotherapist and twice a day at home. The exercises performed were as follows; posterior capsule stretching; wand exercise; scapulatoracic (st), acromioclavicular (ac) and sternoclavicular (sc) joint mobilisation; GH joint posterior, anterior, inferior sliding; GH joint distraction; deep friction massage of the tendon of the supraspinatus muscle; kinesiological taping; isometric and isotonic strengthening exercises; proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises (pnf); closed kinetic ring and proprioception exercises
Sponsors
Istinye University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 30-65 years * Diagnosis of stage I or II shoulder impingement syndrome * Received one dose of PRP injection * Referred for and seeking physical therapy * Voluntary participation * Ability to cooperate with the study procedures
Exclusion criteria
* Previous surgical treatment for shoulder impingement syndrome * Presence of other orthopedic conditions (e.g., shoulder fractures) * Presence of neuromuscular disease * Presence of a pacemaker * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Posture Assessment | Baseline and Day 21 | Corbin posture scale was used. Postural scores obtained by looking laterally and posteriorly were summed and evaluated as (0-2: excellent, 3-4: very good, 5-7: good, 8-11: fair, 12≥ poor). |
| Range of Motion (ROM) Evaluation | Baseline and Day 21 | Normal joint movements were assessed using a universal goniometer. Passive and active shoulder joint flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation were evaluated. |
| Manual Muscle Test | Baseline and Day 21 | During the manual muscle test, the patient was positioned appropriately for the muscle being evaluated. They were asked to actively perform the movement. The force generated by the muscle was evaluated by applying manual resistance. Muscle strength of the shoulder flexors, extensors, abductors, internal rotators, and external rotators was rated on a scale of 0-5 (no contraction 0, very weak 1, weak 2, moderate 3, good 4, and normal 5. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) | Baseline and Day 21 | DASH consists of 3 parts. In all questions, the person marks the appropriate answer in the 5-point Likert system. At the end of the questionnaire, the sum of the marked items is divided by the number of marked items, subtracted by one, then multiplied by 25 and the DASH total score is found. According to the result of the questionnaire, a score between 0-100 is obtained from each section (0: no disability, 100: maximum disability). |
| Constant Murley Shoulder Score (CMS) | Baseline and Day 21 | It is a functional test used to evaluate ROM, muscle strength and functional level of the shoulder joint. The total constant score is classified as best (90-100), good (80-90), moderate (70-79) and poor (\<70). |
| Pain Assessment | Baseline and Day 21 | Short-form Mc-Gill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The SF-MPQ assesses the sensory, emotional and intensity of pain. A total of 15 determinant pain descriptions are included. Three pain scores (sensory, emotional and total pain rate) are obtained . VAS In order to evaluate the pain of the patient subjectively, the patient was asked to mark the shoulder pain intensity on the pain scale evaluated over 10 digits. |
| Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) | Baseline and Day 21 | FIT-HaNSA is a standard three-task test battery that assesses functional endurance involving repetitive lifting and overhead activities in the upper extremity. The tests simulate lifting and sustained shoulder movements performed at a controlled rate (60 beats/min). In the first two tasks, the participant carries three 1 kg objects one by one between shelves using their affected arm. The first task represents reaching activities performed at waist level, and the second task represents reaching activities performed at shoulder level. In the third task, the participant performs screw insertion and removal operations while holding both arms in an overhead position in an eye-level arrangement. Short rest periods are provided between tasks, and each task lasts a maximum of 300 seconds. The second at which the patient completes the test is evaluated and recorded. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed