Hallux Valgus
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to comparatively investigate the immediate effects of rigid taping and kinesiological taping applications on foot biomechanics in patients with hallux valgus (HV). The main questions it aims to answer are: Which taping approach (rigid or kinesiology) produces the most effective and fastest treatment response in the management of hallux valgus? Researchers will compare two taping methods to investigate which method offers a more effective and faster treatment response in terms of foot biomechanics. Participants will: 1. Individuals aged 18-65 years 2. Individuals with mild to moderate HV in one or both feet 3. HV patients who do not require/are not suitable for surgery or who refuse surgery and are referred/apply for conservative treatment 4. Individuals who have not engaged in any strenuous exercise or activity (such as running, walking, weight or resistance training, yoga, pilates, aerobics, step, etc.) in the last 2 days before evaluation.
Interventions
OTHERrigit taping
rigit taping technique
OTHERkinesiologic taping
kinesiologic taping technique
Sponsors
Hacettepe University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Individuals aged 18-65 years 2. Individuals with mild to moderate HV in one or both feet 3. HV patients who do not require/are not suitable for surgery or who refuse surgery and are referred/apply for conservative treatment 4. Individuals who have not engaged in any strenuous exercise or activity (such as running, walking, weight or resistance training, yoga, pilates, aerobics, step, etc.) in the last 2 days before evaluation.
Exclusion criteria
1. The presence of contraindications for the use of the tapes (skin lesions, wounds, fungal infections, allergic reactions, sensory loss, etc.). 2. Diagnosis of diabetic foot. 3. Complete loss of hallux mobility, presence of interdigital neuroma, excessive pain and tenderness during mobility. 4. Foot posture in advanced pronation or supination. 5. The presence of diseases or problems that may affect gait (necessity of using a walking aid, visual or hearing impairment, other problems related to the lower extremity or spine). 6. Having experienced orthopedic trauma or surgery involving the lower extremity. 7. The presence of severe shortness of breath or inability to tolerate walking while walking. 8. The person's; 9. Having a medical history that increases the risk of falls, such as unexplained fainting, blood sugar imbalance, unstable low or high blood pressure. 10\. Having an orthopedic or rheumatological disease (rheumatoid arthritis, gout, etc.) or a systemic disease associated with diabetes or connective tissue disorder. 11\. Being pregnant or in the first 6 months postpartum. 12. Having cooperation problems to the extent that one cannot understand and comply with the assessment protocols.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pedobarogaphic parameters | Day 1 | Regional plantar pressure analysis (heel, midfoot, metatarsal heads and hallux) |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed