Skip to content

Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Intracapsular Displaced Fracture Neck Femur in Elderly Active Patients

Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Intracapsular Displaced Fracture Neck Femur in Elderly Active Patients; Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07409909
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-02-13
Start date
2023-01-02
Completion date
2026-01-15
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Displaced Fracture Neck Femur, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, Elderly Active Patients

Brief summary

Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a worldwide health problem that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Most femoral neck fractures are associated with a fall, and the risk factors include osteoporosis, chronic medication use, and reduced level of activity. Femoral neck fractures are among the most common injuries in the elderly, and their number continues to increase with a more aged population. In the elderly, femoral neck fractures may lead to significant mortality and morbidity, with impaired mobility and loss of independence. Given their high incidence and associated detrimental effects on patient lives. The femoral neck fracture is a major type of hip fracture, whose treatment includes internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA). The decision depends on multiple variables, including fracture pattern, surgeon comfort, and the patient's age, health, and ambulatory status. Internal fixation is a preferred management option for young people or the elderly who are intolerant of prosthesis surgery. THA and HA are widely used in displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Surgery in these patients is undertaken to facilitate nursing and provide timely pain relief, rapid mobilization, and accelerated rehabilitation In general, HA has the advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss, less technical demand, less economic burden, and a lower dislocation rate. However, some patients treated with HA require conversion to THA due to complications such as acetabular erosion. THA, on the other hand, has been associated with superior patient satisfaction and better hip function, less acetabular erosion, and a lower revision rate. However, increased surgical complexity, operation time, and blood loss, as well as higher dislocation rates in THA for FNFs, remain a concern

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal Hip Arthroplasty

Patients will have total hip arthroplasty for managing neck femur fracture

Patients in the control group with femur fracture will have bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* were aged ≥ 65 years * with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck (Garden type III, IV).

Exclusion criteria

* extracapsular fracture of the femoral neck * Pathological fractures, or open fractures * Active infections at or near the hip joints. * bedridden, immobile, or cognitively impaired patients * patients with associated pelvic or acetabular fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
functional improvement12 monthswill be assessed via modified Harris Hip Score. The score is calculated based on four parameters: pain (0-44 points), function (0-47 points), absence of deformity (0-4 points), and range of motion (0-5 points).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026