Skip to content

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Balloon Assisted Enteroscopy Assisted Narrow Incision and Balloon Dilation in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease Small Intestinal Stenosis

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Balloon Assisted Enteroscopy Assisted Narrow Incision and Balloon Dilation in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease Small Intestinal Stenosis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07409376
Acronym
CD stenosis
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-02-13
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CD - Crohn's Disease

Keywords

Crohn's Disease; balloon-assisted enteroscopy; stricture

Brief summary

This study is designed as a controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided radial incision therapy for the treatment of stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. The study aims to compare therapeutic outcomes, procedure-related complications, and recurrence rates in patients with stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease undergoing balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided radial incision therapy. The results are expected to provide a novel and reliable treatment option for patients with stricturing Crohn's disease and to lay a foundation for improving disease-related symptoms and quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREstricture incision

Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided stricture incision versus balloon dilation

Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided balloon dilation

PROCEDURENo Interventions

No Intervention

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 16 and 75 years. 2. Diagnosis of Crohn's disease with primary or secondary small bowel stricture confirmed by imaging studies, or small bowel stricture identified by enteroscopy. 3. Inadequate response to conventional medical therapy and step-up treatment strategies. 4. Stricture length less than 5 cm. 5. Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Bowel wall thickening with Limberg grade IV blood flow on intestinal ultrasound, or presence of complications such as perforation, fistula, deep ulcer, inflammatory mass, or abscess. 2. Deep ulcer in the stricture segment observed by enteroscopy, potentially involving the muscular layer. 3. Presence of strictures in the esophagus, stomach, or duodenum. 4. Presence of colorectal stricture or ileocecal valve stricture. 5. Small bowel stricture complicated by abscess, fistula, or severe angulation. 6. Patients with ≥3 small bowel strictures or stricture length ≥5 cm. 7. Strictures previously treated with stent placement, dilation, or incision but without sustained symptom-free remission for at least 1 year. 8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 9. Inability to undergo endoscopic treatment. 10. Severe coagulation disorders (platelet count \<70,000/μL, INR \>1.5). 11. Concomitant advanced tumors or other severe organ diseases. 12. Suspected localized intestinal malignancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 1-year follow-up1 yearPercentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention, including endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), endoscopic stricture incision (EST), or surgery, within 1 year after the initial procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 3-year follow-up3 yearsPercentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention (EBD, EST, or surgery) within 3 years after the initial procedure.
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 5-year follow-up5 yearsPercentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention (EBD, EST, or surgery) within 5 years after the initial procedure.
Safety assessment of the two treatment methodsWithin 2 months post-procedureEvaluation of procedure-related complications, including postoperative bleeding, perforation, and any adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 2 months after the procedure.
Immediate technical success of the procedureAt the time of procedureAssessment of successful passage of the endoscope through the stricture immediately after balloon dilation or stricture incision.
Symptom-free duration within 1 year post-procedure1 yearDuration of symptom-free period within 1 year after the procedure, defined as a score ≤1 on the obstruction symptom assessment scale.
Cost analysis of the two treatment methodsUp to 1 year post-procedureComparative analysis of medical costs associated with balloon dilation versus stricture incision, including procedure, hospitalization, and follow-up expenses.

Contacts

CONTACTShenglong Xia, Phd
xsl89@zju.edu.cn+86-19857128950
CONTACTSurong Hu, PhD
526315332@qq.com+86-15868532956
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYan Chen, PhD

Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026