Skip to content

SOPHIE: Standardized Online Patient for Healthcare Interaction Education

SOPHIE: Standardized Online Patient for Healthcare Interaction Education

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07409233
Acronym
SOPHIE
Enrollment
51
Registered
2026-02-13
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2026-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinician Communication Skills Training

Keywords

Medical education, Artificial intelligence

Brief summary

This study evaluated an online simulation based educational program designed to improve clinician communication skills. Participants were clinicians and clinical trainees who completed simulated patient interactions and communication assessments as part of an educational evaluation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an AI based simulation training program or standard educational materials. Communication performance was assessed using standardized rating methods in simulated scenarios. The study did not involve patients or health related clinical interventions.

Detailed description

This study was a randomized educational evaluation of an AI based online simulation training program designed to support the development of clinician communication skills. Participants included clinicians and clinical trainees who routinely engage in patient communication as part of their professional roles. Participants were randomly assigned to either the SOPHIE simulation training program or a control educational condition consisting of standard instructional materials. All participants completed simulated patient encounters that were evaluated by trained standardized patients and expert raters using structured communication assessment tools. The primary outcomes of interest focused on communication skill performance in simulated scenarios as well as participant feedback on the educational experience. The study did not involve real patients clinical care or health related interventions and was conducted as an educational research project. The study was approved by the institutional review board prior to participant enrollment. It was registered retrospectively in ClinicalTrials.gov at the request of a journal during manuscript preparation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSOPHIE Simulation Training

An online simulation based educational training program that uses interactive virtual patient scenarios to support the development of clinician communication skills in simulated clinical encounters.

BEHAVIORALControl Educational Materials

Standard educational content related to clinician communication skills delivered through instructional materials such as videos and readings without interactive simulation.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors rating simulated patient encounters were blinded to participant group assignment.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned to either an AI based simulation training program or a control educational condition and completed simulated patient encounters for assessment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants are clinicians or clinical trainees involved in patient communication as part of their professional or educational role * Age 18 years or older * Ability to participate in online educational activities and simulated patient encounters * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior participation in this study * Inability to complete the required online activities or simulated encounters * Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with participation or data quality

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Communication Performance Improvement Score in Simulated Patient EncountersImmediately following completion of the assigned educational conditionCommunication performance was assessed during simulated patient encounters using standardized rating instruments completed by trained standardized patients or expert reviewers. The mean communication performance score improvement was calculated for each participant and used to describe communication skills following the assigned educational condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediately following completion of the assigned educational conditionImmediately following simulated patient encounterA structured communication skills rating tool was used to evaluate specific communication behaviors demonstrated during simulated patient encounters. The total communication skill rating score was calculated for each participant.
Mean Empathy Rating Score in Simulated EncountersImmediately following simulated patient encounterEmpathy was assessed during simulated patient encounters using standardized empathy rating scales completed by trained evaluators. The mean empathy rating score was calculated for each participant.
Mean Participant Self Reported Confidence ScoreImmediately following completion of the educational interventionParticipant confidence in communication skills was assessed using a self reported questionnaire administered after completion of the educational intervention. Mean confidence scores were calculated across questionnaire items.
Mean Usability Score of the Educational InterventionImmediately following completion of the educational interventionUsability of the assigned educational intervention was assessed using a standardized usability questionnaire. Mean usability scores were calculated to describe participant experience with the intervention.
Total Participant Satisfaction ScoreImmediately following completion of the educational interventionParticipant satisfaction with the educational experience was assessed using a structured questionnaire. The total satisfaction score was calculated for each participant.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREhsan Hoque, PhD

University of Rochester

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026