Skip to content

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Suture Repair Versus Suture Anchor Repair in Posterior Root Tear of the Medial Meniscus

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Suture Repair Versus Suture Anchor Repair in Posterior Root Tear of the Medial Meniscus: An Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07408323
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-02-13
Start date
2023-08-23
Completion date
2025-05-30
Last updated
2026-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Suture Repair, Posterior Root Tear of the Medial Meniscus, Suture Anchor Repair

Brief summary

The menisci play a fundamental role in maintaining normal knee biomechanics by distributing load, absorbing shock, providing stability, and facilitating joint lubrication. Damage to the meniscus, particularly root tears, disrupts hoop tension and leads to altered joint loading patterns. This condition accelerates cartilage degeneration and predisposes patients to early-onset osteoarthritis, especially when untreated or inadequately managed. Posterior root medial meniscus tears (PRMMTs) have gained increasing clinical attention in the past two decades. These injuries are biomechanically equivalent to a total meniscectomy because they cause extrusion of the meniscus and loss of its load- sharing capacity. PRMMTs typically affect middle-aged and older patients, often associated with degenerative changes, but can also occur in younger populations following trauma or high-impact activities. The clinical presentation of PRMMTs is often subtle, with patients experiencing posterior knee pain, mechanical symptoms, and joint line tenderness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, with characteristic findings such as the "ghost sign" and meniscal extrusion beyond 3 mm. However, diagnosis is frequently delayed, contributing to the progression of cartilage degeneration by the time of surgical intervention. Several risk factors have been identified, including female gender, obesity, varus malalignment, and increased posterior tibial slope. These factors not only predispose patients to PRMMTs but also influence the prognosis following surgical repair. Given the high prevalence of these risk factors, especially in populations with rising obesity and osteoarthritis incidence, effective treatment strategies have become essential. Surgical repair techniques have evolved significantly to restore hoop stresses and improve long-term outcomes. Two widely practiced arthroscopic methods are the transtibial pullout suture repair and the suture anchor repair. Both aim to reattach the meniscal root to its anatomical footprint, thereby restoring biomechanics and delaying degenerative progression.

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Suture Repair

Patients will have arthroscopic transtibial pullout for their Posterior Root Tear of the Medial Meniscus according to the description in the protocol

PROCEDURESuture Anchor Repair

patients will had this procedure according to the description in the protocol

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 20 and 50 years, both sexes. * Acute or degenerative posterior root tear of the medial meniscus confirmed by MRI. * Isolated medial meniscus root tear or tear associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. * Willingness to participate and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate. * Knee joint malalignment (varus/valgus) confirmed clinically and radiologically. * Osteoarthritis grade III or IV according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification. * Irreparable or severely degenerated crushed meniscus. * Prior ipsilateral knee fracture, infection, or tumor. * Patients were deemed unfit for surgery or anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective functional improvement assessed via the Arabic validated form of the Lysholm score.1 yearThe Lysholm score is a 100-point, patient-reported questionnaire evaluating knee ligament and meniscus injury, with higher scores indicating better function. Score of 95-100 indicate excellent function, 84-94 indicate good function, 65-83 indicate fair function, while less than 65 indicates poor function
subjective functional improvement assessed via the Arabic validated form of the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 score1 yearThe International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 score is a 19-item patient-reported outcome measure scoring symptoms, activity, and function on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better knee function and fewer symptoms.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026