Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy Of Intraductal Antibiotic During ERCP In Acute Cholangitis

Comparative Efficacy Of Intraductal Antibiotic During ERCP In Acute Cholangitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07407491
Enrollment
172
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2024-07-09
Completion date
2026-07-08
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Cholangitis, Biliary Obstruction, Biliary Tract Infection, Choledocholithiasis, Malignant Biliary Stricture

Keywords

Acute Cholangitis, ERCP, Intraductal antibiotics, Biliary tract infection, Choledocholithiasis

Brief summary

Does intraductal administration of antibiotics during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in addition to standard systemic antibiotic therapy, improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis compared with standard systemic antibiotic therapy alone?

Detailed description

Acute cholangitis is a serious infection of the biliary system caused by biliary obstruction and infected bile, which may rapidly progress to sepsis if not promptly treated. Standard management includes systemic antibiotics and urgent biliary drainage, most commonly by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, biliary obstruction may impair biliary excretion of systemically administered antibiotics, resulting in subtherapeutic antibiotic concentrations within infected bile. Intraductal administration of antibiotics during ERCP may achieve higher local antimicrobial concentrations at the site of infection. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of intraductal antibiotic administration during ERCP as an adjunct to standard systemic antibiotic therapy in patients with acute cholangitis.

Interventions

Administration described in arm/group description

DRUGDistilled water

Administration described in arm/group description

Sponsors

National University of Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Care provider and patients are blinded from knowing the group of the study.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomised into the intervention or control group (Intervention group will receive intraductal antibiotic Gentamicin and control group will receive intraductal distilled water in ERCP)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients diagnosed with mild and moderate acute cholangitis based on TG 18 * Planned for ERCP within 48 hours * 18 years old and above

Exclusion criteria

* Severe acute cholangitis * History of antibiotic hypersensitivity * Receiving cancer chemotherapy, steroids, or immunosuppressive agents * Concomitant infections * Recent biliary interventions such as percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) within last 3 months * Known or suspected perforated tympanic membrane, myasthenia gravis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the efficacy of local intraductal antibiotic administration during ERCP in patients with acute cholangitis, as assessed by resolution of clinical symptoms and improvement in inflammatory markers and liver function tests.Evaluated at specific timepoints at admission, on the day of ERCP (pre-procedure), and daily from Day 1 to Day 3 following ERCP.1. Change in Inflammatory Markers: Reduction in total white cell count (WCC), expressed in ×10⁹/L, and C-reactive protein (CRP), expressed in mg/L, measured from baseline (pre-ERCP) to 24-72 hours post-ERCP. 2. Change in Liver Function Tests: Improvement in liver function parameters including total bilirubin (µmol/L), direct bilirubin (µmol/L), alkaline phosphatase (ALP; U/L), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (AST; U/L), and international normalized ratio (INR), measured from baseline (pre-ERCP) to 24-72 hours post-ERCP. 3. Change in Vital Signs: Serial improvement in vital signs, including body temperature (°C), blood pressure (mmHg), and pulse rate (beats per minute), measured from baseline (pre-ERCP) to 72 hours following ERCP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the length of hospital stayFrom hospital admission through hospital discharge during the index hospitalization (up to approximately 30 days).Total duration of hospitalization, calculated as the number of days from the date of hospital admission to the date of hospital discharge following the index ERCP procedure.
To compare the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy.From initiation of intravenous antibiotic therapy after hospital admission through discontinuation of intravenous antibiotics during the index hospitalization (up to approximately 30 days).Criteria for intravenous to per oral switch antibiotic: * Able to tolerate oral therapy * No vomiting or diarrhea or nil by mouth * Clinical improvement with temperature less than 38°C, systolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg, heart rate \<100 beats per minute, and normal white blood cell count or a decrease of at least 2x10\^9/L over the last 24 hours.
To compare the number of participants that developed a peri-procedural complication.Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure until day 3 following ERCP.Peri-procedural complications assessed by post-ERCP monitoring, including pancreatitis, procedure-related bleeding, cardiopulmonary complications, gastrointestinal perforation, and sedation-related adverse events, recorded until day 3 following ERCP.

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

CONTACTTiew Toot Chaw
warrentiew@gmail.com+60176175253
CONTACTAzlanudin Azman
drazlan@ppukm.ukm.my+60192817878
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAzlanudin Azman

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026