Skip to content

Comparison of Allograft, Xenograft and Combined Grafting in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Radiographic, Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Allograft, Xenograft, and Combined Grafting in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07407361
Acronym
SINUS-GRAFT
Enrollment
37
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2022-06-30
Completion date
2024-04-24
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation, Posterior Maxillary Atrophy

Keywords

Maxillary sinus augmentation, Bone grafts, Dental implants

Brief summary

This prospective randomized clinical study evaluates and compares three different grafting approaches (allograft, xenograft, and combined grafting) used in lateral maxillary sinus augmentation prior to dental implant placement. Patients with posterior maxillary bone deficiency (residual bone height ≤4 mm) undergoing sinus lift surgery were randomly assigned to one of three grafting groups. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess bone height before surgery, immediately after grafting, and at 6 months. During implant placement at 6 months, bone biopsy samples were collected from the grafted sites for histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. The study aims to assess vertical bone gain, graft height stability, and biological bone healing using osteocalcin, osteopontin, and RUNX2 markers. The results are intended to provide clinically relevant information regarding the volumetric and biological behavior of different graft materials used in maxillary sinus augmentation.

Interventions

PROCEDURELateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Allograft

Lateral sinus floor elevation was performed using allograft material prior to dental implant placement.

PROCEDURELateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Xenograft

Lateral sinus floor elevation was performed using xenograft material prior to dental implant placement.

PROCEDURELateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Combined Graft

Lateral sinus floor elevation was performed using a combination of allograft and xenograft materials prior to dental implant placement.

PROCEDUREDental Implant Placement Without Sinus Augmentation

Dental implant placement was performed without sinus augmentation. Bone biopsy samples were obtained from the implant site during implant placement for histological and immunohistochemical evaluation.

Sponsors

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed by a blinded examiner.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 75 years. * Patients presenting with posterior maxillary edentulism requiring dental implant rehabilitation. * Residual alveolar bone height of 4 mm or less, indicating the need for lateral maxillary sinus augmentation. * Patients suitable for lateral sinus lift surgery based on clinical and radiographic evaluation. * Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic conditions that could affect bone healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, metabolic bone diseases). * History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy to the head and neck region. * Active sinus pathology or chronic sinusitis. * Heavy smoking (more than 10 cigarettes per day). * Pregnancy or lactation. * Use of medications known to affect bone metabolism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vertical Bone Height Gain6 monthsVertical bone height gain following lateral maxillary sinus augmentation, measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft Height Loss6 monthsChange in grafted bone height between early postoperative and 6-month CBCT measurements.
Histological New Bone Formation6 monthsQualitative and semi-quantitative histological evaluation of new bone formation in bone biopsy samples obtained during implant placement.
Immunohistochemical Expression of Osteogenic Markers6 monthsImmunohistochemical expression of osteocalcin, osteopontin, and RUNX2 in bone biopsy samples obtained from grafted sites.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 13, 2026