Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy of Coconut Oil Mouth Care for Non-autonomous Hospitalised Elderly People.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Coconut Oil Mouth Care for Non-autonomous Hospitalised Elderly People: a Multicentric Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07406425
Acronym
COCO-CARE
Enrollment
94
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2026-03-15
Completion date
2026-10-15
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatrics, Oral Health Care

Keywords

geriatrics, oral health care, elderly, coconut oil, palliative care

Brief summary

This is a prospective, longitudinal, randomised, open-label, multicentric, interventional, comparative superiority study. The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of oral care with coconut oil on the oral status of elderly people hospitalised in geriatrics, versus oral care with glycerol sticks.

Interventions

PROCEDURECoconut oil mouth care

Daily oral care is done with coconut oil throughout the patient's hospitalization

PROCEDUREGlycerin mouthwashes

Daily oral care is performed with glycerin sticks as in current practice.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Limoges
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 75 and over * Patients hospitalised in geriatric medicine and geriatric SMR departments * Patients able to open their mouths for treatment * Patients not able to carry out their oral hygiene on their own * Patients who have given their written consent (consent of the patient or patient consent accompanied by the designated representative if the patient is unable to give written consent)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known allergy to coconut * Patients requiring medicated mouth care as prescribed by a doctor * Patients under guardianship, tutorship or curatorship * Confused patients who have had medically diagnosed dehydration for less than 48 hours * Patients with swallowing difficulties * Patients in the terminal phase of end of life Secondary

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Revised Oral Assement Guide (ROAG) between Day 1 and Day 8From Day 1 to Day 8Change in total score between Day 1 (D1) and Day 8 (D8) on the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG), translated and validated in French. The scale assesses 8 indicators (voice, swallowing, lips, tongue,saliva, mucous membranes, gums and teeth) according to 3 levels. The result gives a total score out of 24 points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weekly ROAG scores (Revised Oral Assment Guide)Every week from the date of inclusion until the date of discharge, on average over 37 days.Weekly ROAG scores (overall score and score per indicator) for all participants included until discharge (an assessment will also be carried out at discharge).
ROAG betwen Day 1 (D1) and Day 8 (D8) for patients with "palliative care" statusfrom Day 1 to Day 8Changes in the ROAG overall score between D1 and D8, translated and validated in French. The degree of dependence is assessed using the KATZ scale (dependence group) at inclusion.
Number of oral care stoppedAt the end of the study, on average of 37 days.Number of patients who stopped the oral care initially proposed and reasons for discontinuing oral care, evaluated at the end of the study

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026