Skip to content

A Comparative Analysis of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes: Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon With Debulking Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Femoropopliteal Artery Occlusions

A Comparative Analysis of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty With Adjunctive Debulking Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for the Treatment of Chronic Femoropopliteal Artery Occlusions

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07406308
Acronym
DCB-Debulk-COM
Enrollment
408
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2028-05-30
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoropopliteal Artery Occlusion

Keywords

Femoropopliteal Artery Occlusion, Drug-Coated Balloon, debulking procedures

Brief summary

This study aims to compare mid-to long-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with adjunctive debulking versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of chronic femoropopliteal artery diseases.

Detailed description

Chronic femoropopliteal artery occlusion, particularly in long lesions, remains a significant challenge in endovascular treatment of lower extremity arterial disease due to its high occlusion burden and severe vascular calcification. In recent years, with the continuous advancement of endovascular techniques and devices, especially the emergence of the "leave nothing behind" concept, Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) angioplasty has become a mainstream approach for treating femoropopliteal occlusions. While DCB offers excellent long-term patency and preserves future treatment options, adjunctive debulking procedures-a category of techniques that physically remove or ablate plaque prior to DCB dilation to achieve a larger, smoother lumen-have gained attention. These techniques primarily include atherectomy, laser ablation, and directional atherectomy. They can address more complex lesions and offer potential benefits such as enhanced drug absorption, reduced elastic recoil, and decreased need for bailout stenting. However, they also carry risks, including distal embolism and perforation. Consequently, the comparative efficacy between DCB alone and DCB combined with debulking measures remains uncertain, and the choice of treatment strategy still largely depends on operator experience. Therefore, an in-depth investigation is necessary to compare the efficacy and safety of these two approaches to inform and guide optimal clinical decision-making.

Interventions

No debulking procedures were taken

DEVICEpaclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with debulking procedures

The patient underwent DCB treatment along with debulking procedures (such as laser or plaque rotational atherectomy, etc.).

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Masking Description

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, controlled cohort study. 1. Eligible patients with chronic femoropopliteal artery occlusions will be assigned to one of the two treatment groups based on a combination of clinical assessment, anatomical factors, and patient preference: (1) the Combination Therapy Group (paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with adjunctive atherectomy/debulking), or (2) the DCB-Alone Group (paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty alone). 2. Treatment allocation is not randomized. Patients in both groups will be prospectively followed and their outcomes compared to assess the relative efficacy and safety of the two treatment strategies.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject age 18-85yrs. * Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form. * Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing. * Rutherford category 2-5. * Subject has atherosclerotic de novo, non-stented restenotic, or in-stent restenotic/occlusive lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal artery (P1 segment). * Patent inflow artery with stenosis \<30% by visual estimation (or by core lab assessment if available) and at least 1 infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\<50% diameter stenosis). * A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject presents with acute arterial embolism or thrombosis requiring thrombectomy or thrombolysis for limb ischemia. * Subject has arterial occlusion caused by thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease) or other forms of immune-mediated vasculitis. * Subject has undergone surgery on the target vessel within the past 3 months, or has experienced repeated failures of endovascular therapy and is deemed unsuitable for further endovascular intervention. * Subject has an uncontrolled thrombophilia or hypercoagulable state. * Subject has a severe systemic disease (e.g., malignancy) with a life expectancy of less than 1 year. * Subject has contraindications or intolerance to antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, or heparin. * Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Subject meets one or more of the following conditions: chronic renal insufficiency (SCr ≥ 2.5 mg/dL) or on regular dialysis; cardiovascular or cerebrovascular surgery within the past 1 month; or severe sequelae from a major stroke. * Subject has a known allergy to nitinol alloy, paclitaxel, or contrast agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1-year primary patency rate1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
free from clinical-driven target lesion revascularization1 year

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTLeng Ni, MD
nileng@163.com86-1069152501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026