Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects Using ePRO and a Standardized Telenursing Program for Cancer Patients

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects Using ePRO and a Standardized Telenursing Program for Cancer Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07405931
Enrollment
414
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2025-07-09
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Breast Cancer, Advanced Colon Cancer, Advanced Gastric Cancer, Advanced Lung Cancer, Early Breast Cancer, Early Colon Cancer, Early Gastric Cancer, Early Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a digital health platform that integrates a symptom reporting and management software with a standardized telenursing program, allowing cancer patients to actively monitor, report, and self-manage chemotherapy-related adverse effects.

Interventions

OTHERStandardized Telenursing

Within Smart Cancer Care Plus, predefined criteria are applied to trigger standardized telenursing interventions. When patients report symptoms of Grade 3 or higher severity, or when a scheduled weekly symptom report is not submitted within 48 hours of the designated reporting date, a structured telephone counseling session is initiated. This process is intended to ensure timely clinical follow-up, support appropriate self-management, and prevent the progression of unmanaged adverse events.

OTHERSmart Cancer Care Plus

Smart Cancer Care Plus is a digital platform for patient-reported symptom monitoring and management, developed for individuals receiving chemotherapy. The system enables structured reporting of chemotherapy-related adverse events and provides standardized information regarding the severity grading of symptoms, accompanied by evidence-based self-management strategies. This intervention is intended to promote systematic symptom monitoring and to facilitate timely clinical responses to adverse events.

Sponsors

Ulsan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Center, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 19 years or older * Diagnosed with early or advanced gastric, lung, breast, or colon cancer * Starting first-cycle chemotherapy with a new anticancer agent * Able to use a smartphone without difficulty * Willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who have difficulty communicating due to cognitive impairment, visual impairment, hearing impairment, or other reasons * Individuals who cannot read, write, or understand Korean * Other individuals deemed inappropriate for participation by the investigators

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life Measured by EORTC QLQ-C3012 weeksQuality of life will be assessed using the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The score for the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-management, which will be assessed using the SECD-6-K6 monthsSelf-management will be assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Chronic Disease Scale-6 Item, Korean Version (SECD-6-K). The SECD-6-K consists of 6 items, each rated on a 10-point Likert scale (1-10). The total score ranges from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating better self-management.
Self-rated overall health, which will be assessed using EQ-5D-VAS6 monthsSelf-rated overall health will be assessed using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-VAS). Participants rate their overall health on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. Higher scores indicate better self-rated health.
Adherence to ePROSW6 monthsAdherence to ePROSW will be assessed by measuring the frequency of app usage over the entire 6-month study period. App adherence is defined as the total number of times participants accessed and used the ePROSW application during the study period.
Chemotherapy Adherence6 monthsChemotherapy adherence will be evaluated by the percentage of planned chemotherapy completed. Adherence will be calculated as the ratio of the administered dose to the planned dose, expressed as a percentage.
Functional status, which will be assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C306 monthsFunctional status will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The functional scales include physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning. Scores for each scale are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better functioning.
Symptom severity, which will be assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C306 monthsSymptom severity will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The symptom scales include fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Scores for each symptom scale are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (worse outcome).
Healthcare Utilization6 monthsHealthcare utilization will be assessed by the occurrence of unplanned hospital visits during the study period.
Satisfaction, which will be assessed using system usability scale6 monthsUser satisfaction with the system will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a validated 10-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The total SUS score is calculated by multiplying the sum of item scores by 2.5, resulting in a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction (better usability).

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

CONTACTMinseon Song, bachelor's degree
9204564@uuh.ulsan.kr+82522507018
CONTACTSomin Joen, bachelor's degree
9204648@uuh.ulsan.kr+82522301417
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSujin Koh, Doctor of Philoshophy

Ulsan University Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKeun Soek Lee, Doctor of Philoshophy

National Cancer Center, Korea

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSung Hoon Sim, Doctor of Philoshophy

National Cancer Center, Korea

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJi Hyung Hong, Doctor of Philoshophy

National Cancer Center, Korea

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSun Jin Sym, Doctor of Philoshophy

Gachon University Gil Medical Center

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJung Hun Kang, Doctor of Philoshophy

Gyeongsang National University Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSeong Hoon Shin, Doctor of Philoshophy

Kosin University Gospel Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026