Skip to content

Flecainide Safety in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Randomized Evaluation of fleCAinide Safety Versus STandard of Care in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07405671
Acronym
ReCAST AF
Enrollment
988
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, rhythm control, stable coronary artery disease, flecainide, sotalol, amiodarone

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the antiarrhythmic drug flecainide can be used as safely as standard rhythm-control drugs in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The study includes adults aged 18 years and older who have AF and known but stable coronary artery disease. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Is treatment with flecainide as safe as standard rhythm-control drugs (sotalol or amiodarone) in this patient group? * Does flecainide lead to similar or fewer serious side effects, hospitalisations, or deaths compared with standard treatment? Researchers will compare patients treated with flecainide to patients treated with standard rhythm-control therapy (sotalol or amiodarone) to see whether flecainide is not worse in terms of safety outcomes. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either flecainide or standard rhythm-control medication * Take the assigned medication as part of routine clinical care * Attend regular follow-up visits at the hospital and have additional follow-up by telephone * Undergo routine heart tests such as electrocardiograms and echocardiography * Complete questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and daily functioning This study follows patients for at least one year and collects information on safety, heart rhythm outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare use.

Interventions

DRUGflecainide

Flecainide, a class Ic anti-arrhythmic drug Recommended starting dose of 100 to 150 mg per day per os, either spread in 2 equal doses BID or in 1 dose OD with controlled release formulation. Flecainide will always be combined with an AV nodal blocker (beta-blocker or diltiazem/verapamil).

DRUGSotalol or Amiodarone

Class III anti-arrhythmic drug: Sotalol or amiodarone as per physician preference. Recommended starting doses: * Sotalol: 80 mg BID per os, with a dose adjustment to once daily if the eGFR is between 40 and 60 mL/min. * Amiodarone: loading dose of 600 mg daily per os in divided doses for 1 week, followed by 400 mg daily per os in divided doses for 1 week, and subsequently 200 mg per os once daily.

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER
Research Foundation Flanders
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Multicenter, pragmatic, 2-arm, parallel group, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures 2. At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form 3. Non-permanent atrial fibrillation or ectopic atrial tachycardia with rhythm control strategy, documented on any modality in the 1 year preceding the consent date 4. Stable coronary artery disease without argument, defined as: 1. Prior percutaneous coronary intervention; OR 2. Prior revascularised ACS or coronary artery bypass surgery \> 3 months at enrolment; OR 3. Invasive coronary angiography demonstrating coronary atherosclerosis, defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis in at least one major epicardial coronary artery; OR 4. Coronary CT scan showing coronary stenosis CAD-RADS stage ≥ 3 on, including CAD-RADS stages 4 and 5 in the absence of ischemia on exercise testing, myocardial perfusion imaging (MIBI), stress cardiac MRI, or fractional flow reserve. 5. LVEF ≥ 45% documented on any imaging modality\*

Exclusion criteria

1. LVEF \< 45% 2. NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure 3. Active treatment with amiodarone 4. History of intolerance of flecainide or both sotalol and amiodarone 5. Clinically significant uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia before initiation of trial treatment. 6. Evidence or history of thyroid dysfunction contraindicating amiodarone use, where amiodarone would be prescribed as standard of care treatment. 7. Hypersensitivity to the active substances or any excipients. 8. Unstable angina or inducible ischemia on exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging, stress cardiac MRI, or fractional flow reserve performed for clinical indications 9. Baseline QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, unless a functioning pacemaker is present 10. Baseline corrected QT interval (Fridericia) ≥ 500 ms 11 Pre-existing advanced AV block (second-, or third-degree) 12\. Pre-existing sick sinus syndrome or sinus bradycardia \<50 bpm 13. Known channelopathy 14. Contra-indication to AV-slowing agents, including beta-blockers, diltiazem or verapamil 15. Atrial fibrillation due to reversible cause 16. Active intracardiac thrombus 17. Acute coronary syndrome during the 3-month period preceding the consent date 18. Cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass surgery, during the 3-month period preceding the consent date or planned at a future date at the time of consent 19. Moderate or severe congenital heart disease as per 2020 ESC guidelines 20. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (septal or posterior wall thickness \>1.5 cm) 21. Significant chronic kidney disease (eGFR \<40 mL/min) 22. Life expectancy less than 1 year 23. Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate, highly effective contraceptive 24. Inability to provide written informed consent, including decision-making incapacity due to cognitive impairment or other medical or psychiatric conditions that preclude adequate understanding of the study and its procedures. 25\. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite safety outcome1 yearThe primary outcome measure is a composite safety outcome including all-cause mortality, severe adverse events leading to drug discontinuation, and unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome. Each of these individual components is assessed as secondary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortality1 yearDeath from any cause
Severe adverse events leading to drug discontinuation1 yearAny severe AE leading to intervention discontinuation, including bradyarrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction, QT/QRS prolongation, serious extra-cardiac adverse events
Unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome1 yearUnscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome
AF recurrence1 yearFreedom from fast atrial arrhythmia post-treatment (clinical recurrence of AF)
Major adverse cardiovascular events1 yearComposite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke
Catheter ablation1 yearIncidence of catheter ablation for AF during follow-up
Cardiovascular hospitalisation duration1 yearTotal number of days of cardiovascular hospitalisation
Treatment-related adverse events1 yearAll serious adverse events and adverse events: * Frequency and severity of all treatment-emergent adverse events * Proportion of participants experiencing at least one AE/SAE. * Specific drug-related adverse events (e.g., QT prolongation, proarrhythmia, bradycardia, hypotension, fatigue, gastrointestinal disturbances).
Cardiac function - LVEF3 monthsChanges in cardiac function assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction expressed in percentages (%) from baseline measured by echocardiography
NT-proBNP3 monthsChange in N-terminal-pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at 3 months from baseline
QTc1 yearChange in QTc interval (ms) and QRS duration (ms) from baseline
Healthcare resource utilization1 yearTotal within-trial healthcare resource utilization expressed in Euro (€)
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaire1 yearChange in patient reported outcomes assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaire. The AFEQT questionnaire is a 20-item, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 to 100 with a higher value corresponding to a better quality of life.
EuroQoL-5 dimension health utility index (EQ-5D-5L)1 yearChange in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the EuroQoL-5 dimension health utility index (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L measures health-related quality of life across five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) on five severity levels (1=no problem to 5=extreme problem). Results are interpreted via a 5-digit health state profile (e.g., 11211), a calculated utility index (ranging from \<0 to 1, where 1=full health), and a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A higher score corresponds to a better quality of life.
Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey1 yearChange in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey. The Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey is interpreted by calculating two main, norm-based scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-where a score of 50 represents the average for the general population. Scores above 50 indicate better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 indicate below-average health.
EHRA symptom score1 yearChange in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom score. The EHRA symptom score is a standardized, four-level classification system used to quantify the severity of symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation based on how they impact daily activities. EHRA Symptom Score Classification (I-IV): EHRA I (Asymptomatic): No symptoms are experienced. EHRA II (Mild Symptoms): Normal daily activity is not affected. EHRA III (Severe Symptoms): Normal daily activity is affected. EHRA IV (Disabling Symptoms): Normal daily activity is discontinued.
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire1 yearChange in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. The WPAI questionnaire is interpreted by calculating four key impairment percentages over the past 7 days, with higher scores (0-100%) indicating greater impairment and lower productivity. It measures absenteeism (time missed), presenteeism (impairment while working), overall work loss, and daily activity impairment, using a 0-10 scale for productivity.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTJoris Ector, MD PhD
Joris.Ector@UZLeuven.be+32 16 34 14 87
CONTACTBert Vandenberk, MD PhD MSc
bert.vandenberk@uzleuven.be

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026