Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Coronary Artery Disease
Conditions
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, rhythm control, stable coronary artery disease, flecainide, sotalol, amiodarone
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the antiarrhythmic drug flecainide can be used as safely as standard rhythm-control drugs in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The study includes adults aged 18 years and older who have AF and known but stable coronary artery disease. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Is treatment with flecainide as safe as standard rhythm-control drugs (sotalol or amiodarone) in this patient group? * Does flecainide lead to similar or fewer serious side effects, hospitalisations, or deaths compared with standard treatment? Researchers will compare patients treated with flecainide to patients treated with standard rhythm-control therapy (sotalol or amiodarone) to see whether flecainide is not worse in terms of safety outcomes. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either flecainide or standard rhythm-control medication * Take the assigned medication as part of routine clinical care * Attend regular follow-up visits at the hospital and have additional follow-up by telephone * Undergo routine heart tests such as electrocardiograms and echocardiography * Complete questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and daily functioning This study follows patients for at least one year and collects information on safety, heart rhythm outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare use.
Interventions
Flecainide, a class Ic anti-arrhythmic drug Recommended starting dose of 100 to 150 mg per day per os, either spread in 2 equal doses BID or in 1 dose OD with controlled release formulation. Flecainide will always be combined with an AV nodal blocker (beta-blocker or diltiazem/verapamil).
Class III anti-arrhythmic drug: Sotalol or amiodarone as per physician preference. Recommended starting doses: * Sotalol: 80 mg BID per os, with a dose adjustment to once daily if the eGFR is between 40 and 60 mL/min. * Amiodarone: loading dose of 600 mg daily per os in divided doses for 1 week, followed by 400 mg daily per os in divided doses for 1 week, and subsequently 200 mg per os once daily.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Multicenter, pragmatic, 2-arm, parallel group, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures 2. At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form 3. Non-permanent atrial fibrillation or ectopic atrial tachycardia with rhythm control strategy, documented on any modality in the 1 year preceding the consent date 4. Stable coronary artery disease without argument, defined as: 1. Prior percutaneous coronary intervention; OR 2. Prior revascularised ACS or coronary artery bypass surgery \> 3 months at enrolment; OR 3. Invasive coronary angiography demonstrating coronary atherosclerosis, defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis in at least one major epicardial coronary artery; OR 4. Coronary CT scan showing coronary stenosis CAD-RADS stage ≥ 3 on, including CAD-RADS stages 4 and 5 in the absence of ischemia on exercise testing, myocardial perfusion imaging (MIBI), stress cardiac MRI, or fractional flow reserve. 5. LVEF ≥ 45% documented on any imaging modality\*
Exclusion criteria
1. LVEF \< 45% 2. NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure 3. Active treatment with amiodarone 4. History of intolerance of flecainide or both sotalol and amiodarone 5. Clinically significant uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia before initiation of trial treatment. 6. Evidence or history of thyroid dysfunction contraindicating amiodarone use, where amiodarone would be prescribed as standard of care treatment. 7. Hypersensitivity to the active substances or any excipients. 8. Unstable angina or inducible ischemia on exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging, stress cardiac MRI, or fractional flow reserve performed for clinical indications 9. Baseline QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, unless a functioning pacemaker is present 10. Baseline corrected QT interval (Fridericia) ≥ 500 ms 11 Pre-existing advanced AV block (second-, or third-degree) 12\. Pre-existing sick sinus syndrome or sinus bradycardia \<50 bpm 13. Known channelopathy 14. Contra-indication to AV-slowing agents, including beta-blockers, diltiazem or verapamil 15. Atrial fibrillation due to reversible cause 16. Active intracardiac thrombus 17. Acute coronary syndrome during the 3-month period preceding the consent date 18. Cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass surgery, during the 3-month period preceding the consent date or planned at a future date at the time of consent 19. Moderate or severe congenital heart disease as per 2020 ESC guidelines 20. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (septal or posterior wall thickness \>1.5 cm) 21. Significant chronic kidney disease (eGFR \<40 mL/min) 22. Life expectancy less than 1 year 23. Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate, highly effective contraceptive 24. Inability to provide written informed consent, including decision-making incapacity due to cognitive impairment or other medical or psychiatric conditions that preclude adequate understanding of the study and its procedures. 25\. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Composite safety outcome | 1 year | The primary outcome measure is a composite safety outcome including all-cause mortality, severe adverse events leading to drug discontinuation, and unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome. Each of these individual components is assessed as secondary outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | 1 year | Death from any cause |
| Severe adverse events leading to drug discontinuation | 1 year | Any severe AE leading to intervention discontinuation, including bradyarrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction, QT/QRS prolongation, serious extra-cardiac adverse events |
| Unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome | 1 year | Unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome |
| AF recurrence | 1 year | Freedom from fast atrial arrhythmia post-treatment (clinical recurrence of AF) |
| Major adverse cardiovascular events | 1 year | Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke |
| Catheter ablation | 1 year | Incidence of catheter ablation for AF during follow-up |
| Cardiovascular hospitalisation duration | 1 year | Total number of days of cardiovascular hospitalisation |
| Treatment-related adverse events | 1 year | All serious adverse events and adverse events: * Frequency and severity of all treatment-emergent adverse events * Proportion of participants experiencing at least one AE/SAE. * Specific drug-related adverse events (e.g., QT prolongation, proarrhythmia, bradycardia, hypotension, fatigue, gastrointestinal disturbances). |
| Cardiac function - LVEF | 3 months | Changes in cardiac function assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction expressed in percentages (%) from baseline measured by echocardiography |
| NT-proBNP | 3 months | Change in N-terminal-pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at 3 months from baseline |
| QTc | 1 year | Change in QTc interval (ms) and QRS duration (ms) from baseline |
| Healthcare resource utilization | 1 year | Total within-trial healthcare resource utilization expressed in Euro (€) |
| Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaire | 1 year | Change in patient reported outcomes assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaire. The AFEQT questionnaire is a 20-item, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 to 100 with a higher value corresponding to a better quality of life. |
| EuroQoL-5 dimension health utility index (EQ-5D-5L) | 1 year | Change in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the EuroQoL-5 dimension health utility index (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L measures health-related quality of life across five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) on five severity levels (1=no problem to 5=extreme problem). Results are interpreted via a 5-digit health state profile (e.g., 11211), a calculated utility index (ranging from \<0 to 1, where 1=full health), and a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A higher score corresponds to a better quality of life. |
| Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey | 1 year | Change in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey. The Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey is interpreted by calculating two main, norm-based scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-where a score of 50 represents the average for the general population. Scores above 50 indicate better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 indicate below-average health. |
| EHRA symptom score | 1 year | Change in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom score. The EHRA symptom score is a standardized, four-level classification system used to quantify the severity of symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation based on how they impact daily activities. EHRA Symptom Score Classification (I-IV): EHRA I (Asymptomatic): No symptoms are experienced. EHRA II (Mild Symptoms): Normal daily activity is not affected. EHRA III (Severe Symptoms): Normal daily activity is affected. EHRA IV (Disabling Symptoms): Normal daily activity is discontinued. |
| Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire | 1 year | Change in patient-reported outcome as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. The WPAI questionnaire is interpreted by calculating four key impairment percentages over the past 7 days, with higher scores (0-100%) indicating greater impairment and lower productivity. It measures absenteeism (time missed), presenteeism (impairment while working), overall work loss, and daily activity impairment, using a 0-10 scale for productivity. |
Countries
Belgium