Skip to content

Effects of tDCS on Fear Reversal in Patients With Anxiety Disorders

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intervention on Fear Reversal in Patients With Anxiety Disorders

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07405463
Enrollment
140
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders

Keywords

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Fear Reversal, Anxiety, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex, Cognitive Flexibility

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effects of single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on fear reversal learning in patients with anxiety disorders. Participants will be randomized into four groups to receive either active stimulation targeting specific brain regions (right DLPFC or vmPFC), an active control stimulation, or sham stimulation. The main goal is to determine if modulating these brain areas can improve the ability to update safety and threat associations.

Detailed description

Anxiety disorders are characterized by deficits in fear regulation and cognitive flexibility, specifically the inability to inhibit fear responses when a threat becomes safe (fear reversal). Neurobiological models suggest this is linked to hyperactivity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) and hypoactivity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study aims to verify if tDCS can improve fear reversal performance. The study involves 140 patients with anxiety disorders assigned to one of four arms: Cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC (inhibitory); Anodal tDCS over the vmPFC (excitatory); Sham tDCS (placebo); Anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC (active control). During the 25-minute stimulation session, participants will perform a computerized fear reversal task. Physiological data (Skin Conductance Response) and subjective anxiety ratings will be recorded simultaneously to assess the intervention's impact on cognitive and emotional regulation.

Interventions

DEVICECathodal tDCS (rDLPFC)

Current intensity: 2.0 mA. Duration: 25 minutes. Cathode placed over F4 (10-20 system), Anode over contralateral deltoid.

DEVICEAnodal tDCS (vmPFC)

Current intensity: 2.0 mA. Duration: 25 minutes. Anode placed over Fpz (10-20 system), Cathode over Oz.

DEVICESham tDCS

Current ramps up for 30 seconds and then fades to zero to mimic skin sensation, with no sustained current for the rest of the 25 minutes.

DEVICEAnodal tDCS (lDLPFC)

Current intensity: 2.0 mA. Duration: 25 minutes. Anode placed over F3 (10-20 system), Cathode over contralateral deltoid.

Sponsors

Jingchu Hu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 60 years old. Right-handed. Meeting the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for Gambling Disorder (GD). South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) score ≥ 5. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing. Willingness to provide written informed consent and participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

History of other severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression) or neurological diseases (e.g., epilepsy, stroke, brain tumor). History of substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine) in the past 6 months. Current use of psychotropic medications that may affect cortical excitability (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants). Presence of metallic implants in the head or neck area (e.g., cochlear implants, aneurysm clips) or cardiac pacemakers. Skin lesions or sensitivity at the stimulation sites on the scalp. Pregnancy or lactation. Participation in other neuromodulation studies within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Accuracy Rate in the Reversal Phase of the Fear Reversal TaskDuring the intervention (Day 1, approximately 25 minutes)The percentage of correct responses during the reversal phase of the computerized task, where participants must inhibit previous fear associations and learn new safety signals. Higher scores indicate better cognitive flexibility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reaction Time in the Reversal PhaseDuring the intervention (Day 1, approximately 25 minutes)The response time (in milliseconds) to the new CS+ (formerly CS-) and new CS- (formerly CS+) stimuli during the reversal phase.
Skin Conductance Response (SCR) AmplitudeDuring the intervention (Day 1, approximately 25 minutes)The amplitude of physiological skin conductance responses to Conditioned Stimuli (CS+ and CS-), serving as an objective measure of physiological arousal and fear response.
Subjective Anxiety Score (VAS)During the intervention (Day 1, assessed intermittently during the 25-minute task)Self-reported anxiety levels measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (extreme anxiety).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026