Skip to content

Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Intratympanic Injection of Small Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Severe and Profound Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Clinical Phase I and IIa Trials of Intratympanic Injection of Small Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Severe and Profound Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07404709
Enrollment
9
Registered
2026-02-11
Start date
2026-02-28
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extracellular Vesicles, Sudden Hearing Loss

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if small extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells work to treat severe and above sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It will also learn about the safety of small extracellular vesicles. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does small extracellular vesicles combined with traditional drug treatment improve hearing even better in severe and above sudden deafness participants? 2. What medical problems do participants have with intratympanic injection of small extracellular vesicles? Researchers will compare small extracellular vesicles to dexamethasone to see if small extracellular vesicles work to treat severe and above sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In clinical Phase I trial, the investigators will complete the safety check and dose exploration. Participants will: 1. Receive traditional drug treatment in accordance with the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sudden Deafness (2015) 2. Receive small extracellular vesicles or a placebo tympanic injection additionally 3. Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests 4. Receive tympanic injections of small extracellular vesicles ranging from low concentration to high concentration 5. Be evaluated for any adverse reactions In clinical Phase II trial, participants were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. Participants will: 6. Received intratympanic injections of small extracellular vesicles 3 times together with traditional drug treatment in experimental group 7. Received intratympanic injections of 5mg dexamethasone 3 times together with traditional drug treatment in control group, also for a total of 3 times Visit the clinic once 7 days , 1month and 3 months after treatment for checkups and tests of pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, tinnitus disability scale and visual analogue scale assessment

Interventions

DRUGTympanic injection of hUC-MSC-sEV-003 (small extracellular vesicles) at low doses

In Clinical Phase I, three participants were first injected with small extracellular vesicles at low doses (2×108particles/mL) together with traditional drug treatment. The intratympanic injection of small extracellular vesicles was given every other day for a total of 3 times for every participants.

DRUGTympanic injection of hUC-MSC-sEV-003 (small extracellular vesicles) at moderate doses

In Clinical Phase I, if no adverse reactions were observed for 2 weeks after the low-dose group was injected, three participants were then injected with small extracellular vesicles at moderat doses (1×109particles/mL) together with traditional drug treatment. The intratympanic injection of small extracellular vesicles was given every other day for a total of 3 times for every participants.

DRUGTympanic injection of hUC-MSC-sEV-003 (small extracellular vesicles) at high doses

n Clinical Phase I, if no adverse reactions were observed for 2 weeks after the moderate-dose group was injected, three participants were then injected with small extracellular vesicles at high doses (5×109particles/mL) together with traditional drug treatment. The intratympanic injection of small extracellular vesicles was given every other day for a total of 3 times for every participants.

DRUGStandard treatment for sudden deafness+hUC-MSC-sEV-003 at an appropriate dose as determined by stage I trial

After the safety verification and dose determination of the Phase I clinical trial were completed, about 20 participants received standard treatment in accordance with the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sudden Deafness (2015)", and at the same time, they were administered intratympanic injections of small extracellular vesicles every other day, for a total of 3 times.

DRUGStandard treatment for sudden deafness+dexamethasone

Participants in the control group received standard treatment in accordance with the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sudden Deafness (2015)", and during their hospitalization, they received intratympanic injections of dexamethasone at a dose of 5mg every other day for a total of 3 times.

Sponsors

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Sudden unilateral hearing loss that occurs within 72 hours, with a decrease of at least 30 decibels in at least 3 frequency ranges compared to the healthy ear, and an average pure tone threshold of ≥ 65 decibels. 2. Enrollment must be completed within 7 days after the onset of sudden deafness. 3. Men or women aged 18 to 65 4. Not treated in any other hospital and not taking any treatment medication on one's own 5. Be able to understand the trial protocol and undergo regular follow-up visits and check-ups

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating women 2. With a history of chronic ear diseases, ear surgery, autoimmune hearing loss or a confirmed diagnosis of Meniere's syndrome in the past 3. Having received steroid treatment for any reason within the past 30 days 4. There are autoimmune diseases or chronic inflammatory diseases. 5. Severe damage to liver and kidney functions 6. Patients with a previous history of cerebral hemorrhage or those currently taking anticoagulant medications 7. Other cases in which the researchers judged the candidates to be unsuitable for inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pure tone testBaseline,7 days,1 month, and 3 months after clinical phase II treatmentThe hearing recovery status is evaluated based on the changes in pure tone threshold from the baseline at enrollment to 3 months of follow-up. The pure tone threshold is the average of air conduction thresholds at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz, and 8 kHz.
speech audiometryBaseline,7 days,1 month, and 3 months after clinical phase II treatmentThe hearing recovery status is also evaluated based on the changes in speech recognition rate from the baseline at enrollment to 3 months of follow-up. The speech audiometry results use the speech recognition rates at the baseline and after treatment of the subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RespirationBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators monitor vital signs respiration. The unit of respiratory rate is breaths per minute with the normal range 12 to 20 beats per minute.
Heart rateBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators also monitor vital signs heart rate. The unit of heart rate is beats per minute with the normal range 60 to 100 beats per minute at rest.
Oxygen saturationBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators also monitor vital signs oxygen saturation. The unit of oxygen saturation is percent with the normal range of 95% to 100%.
Blood pressureBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators also monitor vital signs blood pressure. The unit of blood pressure is mmHg. The normal range is that the systolic pressure should not exceed 140 mmHg, the diastolic pressure should not exceed 90 mmHg, and the blood pressure level should be no less than 90/60 mmHg.
tympanic membrane healing statusBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators observe the healing status of the eardrum. There are two possible outcomes: the eardrum heals or it does not heal.
Haematological index on liver functionBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators assess the changes in haematological index on liver function and kidney function levels compared to the baseline. The indicators for evaluating liver function include biochemical indicators such as albumin, transaminases, and bilirubin.
Haematological index on kidney functionBaseline, 2 weeks after intratympanic injection in the first-phase clinicalThe investigators assess the changes in haematological index on kidney function levels compared to the baseline. The indicators for evaluating kidney function include biochemical parameters such as serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, uric acid, glomerular filtration rate, and urine protein.
Tinnitus Handicap InventoryBaseline,7 days,1 month, and 3 months after clinical phase II treatmentThe assessment of the tinnitus symptoms of the participants is conducted using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory at both the baseline and different post-treatment periods. This scale classifies tinnitus into four grades as follows: Grade 1 (mild), corresponding to a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score of 1 to 16. The tinnitus sound is faint and sometimes present, sometimes absent. Grade 2 (moderate), with a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score of 18 to 36. The tinnitus sound is relatively obvious but generally has a minor impact. Grade 3 (moderately severe), with a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score of 38 to 56. The tinnitus sound is moderate and begins to cause some interference in daily life. Grade 4 (severe), with a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score of 58 to 76. A higher score means a worse result.
Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline,7 days,1 month, and 3 months after clinical phase II treatmentThe psychological assessment of the participants is carried out using the Visual Analogue Scale.The VAS scoring standard uses a straight line or ruler approximately 10 centimeters long, with the two ends marked as 0 and 10 respectively. 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates severe pain. Participants mark the corresponding position according to the degree of pain. 2. Pain grading: 0 indicates no pain; 1-3 indicates mild pain; 4-6 indicates moderate pain; 7-9 indicates severe pain; 10 indicates extreme pain. In this scale,a higher score means a worse result.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTYan Jiang
jiangyanoto@qdu.edu.cn+86-532-82915920
CONTACTCaili Ji
haidecai@163.com+86-532-82915920

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026