Early and Late Neutrophil CD64 and Monocyte HLA-DR as Biomarkers for Septic Shock

Sepsis, Septic Shock

HLADR, NCD64, sepsis, septic-shock

Study Summary: Neutrophil CD64 & Monocyte HLA-DR in Septic Shock What is studied? Doctors looked at two blood markers: * Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64): rises quickly when the body fights infection. * Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR): falls when the immune system becomes weak or "paralyzed." They also calculated a Sepsis Index (ratio of nCD64 to HLA-DR) to see how these markers change in patients with septic shock. Why is this important? Septic shock is a severe form of sepsis that can cause organ failure and death. Early detection and knowing which patients are at higher risk can guide treatment and improve survival. How was it done? * Blood samples were taken on Day 1 (early) and Day 8 (late). * Results will be compared between survivors and non-survivors. * 20 healthy people provided baseline values for comparison. What does this mean? - Monitoring these markers over time (not just once) may helps doctors understand whether a patient's immune system is recovering or worsening. Take-home message For patients and families: \- Septic shock is serious, but doctors now have better tools to track how the body is responding.

Detailed Protocol of the Study 1. Title Early and late neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR as biomarkers for septic shock. 2. Study Design * Type: Prospective, single-center, observational cohort study. * Setting: Medical ICU of a tertiary care university teaching hospital in northern India. * Duration: January 2019 - December 2019. * Ethics Approval: Biomedical Research and Ethics Committee (BREC/18/194). * Guidelines: Conducted in adherence with STROBE reporting standards. 3. Objectives \- Primary Objective: To evaluate neutrophil CD64 (nCD64), monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR), and the Sepsis Index as prognostic markers in septic shock. * Secondary Objectives: * Compare biomarker levels between survivors and non-survivors. * Assess predictive accuracy of these markers for 28-day mortality using ROC analysis. 4. Study Population * Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Diagnosis of septic shock according to prevailing Sepsis-3 criteria. * Written informed consent from patient or next of kin. * Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant females. * Active malignancy. * Severe chronic liver disease. * Chronic kidney disease requiring maintenance hemodialysis. * Immunocompromised patients or those on immunomodulatory therapy prior to sepsis onset. * Non-bacterial sepsis (viral, fungal, tubercular). 5. Enrollment & Sample Size * Screened: 80 patients. * Excluded: 24 (per exclusion criteria). * Final cohort: 56 patients (37 survivors, 19 non-survivors). * Controls: 20 healthy volunteers for baseline biomarker values. 6. Data Collection * Demographics: Age, sex, residence, BMI, smoking status. * Clinical variables: Primary diagnosis, comorbidities, severity scores (qSOFA, SIRS, APACHE II), vital signs, organ dysfunction parameters (PaO₂/FiO₂, inotropic support, renal replacement therapy, GCS). * Laboratory parameters: CBC, renal/liver function tests, ABG, primary diagnosis details. * Outcome measures: ICU stay, ventilator days, 28-day mortality. 7. Biomarker Assessment * Markers: * Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64). * Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR). * Sepsis Index = nCD64 ÷ mHLA-DR. * Method: Flow cytometry (8-color FACS Canto II, BD Biosciences). * Units: Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI). * Time points: * Day 1 (admission). * Day 8 (follow-up). 8. Statistical Analysis * Software: SPSS v24 (IBM). * Descriptive statistics: Mean ± SD for normal data; median (IQR) for skewed data. * Comparisons: * Independent t-test for normal distribution. * Mann-Whitney U test for skewed data. * Predictive analysis: ROC curves for nCD64, HLA-DR, and Sepsis Index. * Significance threshold: p \< 0.05 (two-sided). 9. Outcomes * Primary outcome: 28-day mortality. * Secondary outcomes: ICU stay duration, ventilator days, organ dysfunction severity. 10. Safety & Compliance * Biomedical waste: Managed per Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules. * Patient safety: Standard ICU protocols followed; no intervention beyond routine care.

No related papers found yet.

None listed

India