Skip to content

Electrophysiological Effects of Adjunct Low-Level Laser Therapy and Median Nerve Mobilization After Carpal Tunnel Release

Electrophysiological Effects of Adjunct Low-Level Laser Therapy and Median Nerve Mobilization After Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07400562
Acronym
LL-CTR
Enrollment
45
Registered
2026-02-10
Start date
2023-01-04
Completion date
2025-09-18
Last updated
2026-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome, Neuropathy, Low-level laser therapy, Median nerve mobilization

Brief summary

This randomized controlled study investigated whether adding low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or median nerve mobilization after unilateral carpal tunnel release improves median nerve electrophysiological parameters compared with no adjunctive treatment. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive LLLT, median nerve mobilization, or standard postoperative care. Interventions were delivered over six weeks, and nerve conduction studies were conducted before and after treatment to assess electrophysiological outcomes, with motor distal latency designated as the primary outcome measure.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is commonly managed surgically through carpal tunnel release (CTR); however, postoperative recovery may be accompanied by persistent neural dysfunction and delayed nerve conduction improvement. Adjunct rehabilitation strategies, such as low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and median nerve mobilization, have been proposed to enhance neural recovery, yet their electrophysiological effects following CTR remain insufficiently established. This randomized controlled study aimed to examine and compare the effects of adjunct LLLT and median nerve mobilization on median nerve electrophysiological parameters after unilateral CTR. Forty-five patients diagnosed with unilateral CTS and treated surgically with CTR were recruited. Participants (aged 25-55 years) were randomly allocated into three equal groups. Group A received adjunct gallium arsenide (GaAs) infrared LLLT, Group B underwent median nerve mobilization exercises, and Group C received standard postoperative care without adjunctive therapy. Both intervention protocols were applied three times per week for six consecutive weeks. Electrophysiological assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and after six weeks using standardized nerve conduction studies. Measured parameters included motor distal latency (MDL), sensory distal latency (SDL), motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), and compound motor action potential amplitude (CMAP), with MDL predefined as the primary outcome measure.

Interventions

OTHERGallium Arsenide (GaAs) 904-nm Low-Level Laser Device

Group A: GaAs diode laser, 904 nm, average power 20 mW, probe diameter 7 mm (spot size approximately 0.385 cm²), administered as 1.2 J per point at four standardized points (totaling 4.8 J per session); 60 seconds per point (totaling approximately 4 minutes per session). Over 18 sessions (3 per week for 6 weeks), the total energy administered per treatment cycle is 86.4 J. This methodology and point-based dosing method were chosen to align with prevalent CTS protocols utilizing identical device specifications and total-session dosage, while adhering to the required 904-nm dosing parameters

OTHERTherapist-Supervised Median Nerve Neural Mobilization Exercises

Patients in the group (B) were instructed to do a series of movements that included the median nerve: lateral rotation of the shoulders, depression, wrist extension, supination, shoulder abduction, elbow extension, and bending the neck laterally to the other side. They were directed to maintain the final posture for 20 seconds. Therapist-supervised median nerve mobilization was performed three sessions/week for 6 weeks; each session included three sets of 5 repetitions of the standardized sequence, with the end-position held for 20 seconds per repetition and \~10 seconds rest between repetitions (and \~60 seconds rest between sets). Total mobilization time was \~10-12 minutes per session, and all sessions were conducted under direct therapist supervision to ensure correct positioning and symptom monitoring

Group C patients served as the comparison (control) group.

Sponsors

Galala University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study was designed as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants who had undergone unilateral carpal tunnel release were randomly assigned to one of three intervention arms in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Group A received adjunct low-level laser therapy, Group B received median nerve mobilization exercises, and Group C received standard postoperative care without adjunctive therapy. Randomization was performed using a concealed allocation method. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 25 and 55 years Clinical diagnosis of unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome Underwent surgical carpal tunnel release (transverse carpal ligament release)

Exclusion criteria

Rheumatoid arthritis Diabetes mellitus History of wrist fracture or other wrist joint trauma Current use of anti-inflammatory medications or other interfering medications Receipt of alternative treatments (e.g., acupuncture, physical therapy modalities) Use of wrist orthoses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Median Nerve Motor Distal Latency6 weeksChange in motor distal latency (milliseconds) of the median nerve from baseline (pre-treatment) to 6 weeks post-intervention, assessed using standardized nerve conduction testing (Neuropack) following American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Median Nerve Sensory Distal Latency6 weeksChange in sensory distal latency (milliseconds) of the median nerve from baseline to 6 weeks post-intervention.
Change in Median Nerve Motor Conduction Velocity6 weeksChange in motor nerve conduction velocity (meters/second) of the median nerve from baseline to 6 weeks post-intervention.
Change in Compound Motor Action Potential Amplitude6 weeksChange in CMAP amplitude (millivolts) of the median nerve from baseline to 6 weeks post-intervention.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026