Skip to content

Bupivacaine With Epinephrine Over Diaphragm in Laparoscopy

Instillation of Bupivacaine With Epinephrine Over Diaphragm to Reduce Postoperative Shoulder Pain Following Benign Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07400146
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-02-10
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Pain

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Gynecologic surgery, Bupivacaine

Brief summary

Postoperative shoulder pain is often reported to be particularly bothersome after laparoscopy. The benefits of local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine, applied to subcutaneous tissue for general postoperative pain management after surgery is well established. However, there have been no studies on sprayed bupivacaine over the diaphragm to reduce shoulder pain in laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of the study is to evaluate if sprayed infra-diaphragmatic bupivacaine compared to placebo (saline) will improve postoperative shoulder pain in patients undergoing benign laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. The entire study will be conducted at Cedar Sinai Medical Center.

Interventions

DRUGInstillation of Bupivacaine with epinephrine over the diaphragm

Prior to desufflation of the abdomen during the laparoscopic gynecologic procedure, the surgeon will instill 30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (total of 75 mg) laparoscopically aiming to cover the diaphragm with liquid.

Sponsors

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are randomized into either the treatment arm with placement of bupivacaine with epinephrine over the diaphragm or the no intervention arm. Participants are blinded to whether or not they received the intervention.

Intervention model description

Randomized control trial, single blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Provide a signed and dated informed consent form * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study * 8 years of age or older * Undergoing laparoscopic surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with a surgeon in the Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery division.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Urgent/non-scheduled surgery * Scheduled for planned or possible concomitant non-gynecologic surgery (e.g., urologic or colorectal procedure) * Baseline shoulder pain * Baseline opioid use * Baseline of chronic pain syndrome * Conversion to open surgery * Allergy or intolerance to bupivacaine, lidocaine (or amide class of anesthetics), oxycodone, acetaminophen, or ibuprofen * Planned post-operative admission

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative shoulder pain scores24 hours postoperativelyReported right shoulder pain score using visual analog score (VAS) 24 hours postoperatively Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis = pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Assessed using the validated 100-mm scale with a range of 0-10 (11-point numerical rating scale), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative generalized pain scoresup to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)Post-operative generalized pain scores (superiority): Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group First and last reported generalized pain score in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) using numerical rating score Assessed using the validated 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis
Total analgesic requirements in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) in morphine equivalentsup to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)Calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (continuous data) Analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis test (assuming non-normal data) Data will be presented as median (range)
Length of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)up to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)Length of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (superiority): Null hypothesis = PACU length of stay will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= PACU length of stay will be shorter in the bupivacaine with epinephrine groups Documented in minutes (continuous data) Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed
Post-operative shoulder pain scores at home5 days postoperativelyDaily reported post-operative shoulder pain scores at home (superiority): Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis = pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Assessed using the validated 100-mm scale with a range of 0-10 (11-point numerical rating scale), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis
Post-operative opioid use1 week postoperativePost-operative opioid use (superiority): Null hypothesis = post-op opioid use will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= post-op opioid use will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Number of pills used reported by patient (interval data) Analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis test Data will be presented as median (range)
Surgical outcome: EBLup to 8 hoursSurgical outcomes: EBL (mL) Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Continuous variables: estimated blood loss Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed
Surgical outcome: operative timeup to 8 hoursSurgical outcomes: operative time (minutes) Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Continuous variables: operative time, estimated blood loss Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed
Surgical outcome: intraoperative complicationswithin 1 week of surgerySurgical outcomes: intraoperative complications Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Binary data: Surgical complications (yes/no) Analyzed using chi-square test
Surgical outcomes: conversion to laparotomywithin 6 hours of surgery start timeSurgical outcomes: conversion to laparotomy Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Binary data: conversion to laparotomy (yes/no) Analyzed using chi-square test

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTOgechukwu Ezike, MD
ogechukwu.ezike@cshs.org3473371181
CONTACTKelly Wright, MD
kelly.wright@cshs.org

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026