Skip to content

Effects of Protective Step Training on Proactive and Reactive Motor Adaptations in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Effects of Protective Step Training on Proactive and Reactive Motor Adaptations in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07399613
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-02-10
Start date
2022-01-19
Completion date
2023-03-18
Last updated
2026-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accidental Falls, Fall, Fall Prevention Training, Falls, Intervention, Parkinson Disease, Protective Step Training

Keywords

Parkinson Disease, Falls, intervention, training, Protective Step Training, accidental falls

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent PD affects the ability to walk, respond to balance perturbations (i.e., Protective Step Training) and produce acute short-term effects to improve compensatory reactions and control of unperturbed walking balance.

Detailed description

Understanding the mechanism of compensation and neuroplasticity to unexpected step perturbation training during walking and static stance can have positive implications on the treatment of PD by helping to design effective training paradigms that remediate fall risk. Current rehabilitation therapies are inadequate at reducing falls in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). While pharmacologic and surgical treatments have proved largely ineffective in treating postural instability and gait dysfunction in people with PD, studies have demonstrated that therapy specifically focusing on posture, gait, and balance may significantly improve these factors and reduce falls. The primary goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a novel and promising intervention therapy (protective step training - i.e., PST - balance disturbance/perturbation during treadmill walking) to improve balance as measured by the reaction time and reduce falls in people with PD. A secondary goal was to understand the effects of PST on proactive and reactive feedback responses during stance and gait tasks. Multi-baseline, repeated measures analyses were performed on the multitude of proactive and reactive performance measures to assess the effects of PST on gait and postural stability parameters.

Interventions

Perturbation during standing and walking to actively assess proactive as well as reactive motor adaptations.

Sponsors

Arizona State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
U.S. National Science Foundation
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomized the all walking/training trials

Intervention model description

Crossover design: Prior to testing, subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. One group started with postural perturbation (PP) training (during stance), while the other group began with gait perturbation (GP) training before crossing over (during walking). During this onboarding period, self-reported and observed leg dominance in bilateral mobilizing was utilized to determine the dominant leg that will be perturbed in the walking trials. Investigators described a scenario for the participant in which they were asked which leg they would use to kick a ball over the ground.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* able to ambulate without assistance * had no known neurologic, cardiovascular, or orthopedic deficit - (Mini-Mental Status Examination \<25), and had a Hoehn \& Yahr (H\&Y) score between II-III.

Exclusion criteria

* exhibited functionally disabling dyskinesia * has dystonia, orthostatic hypotension, * had neurosurgical intervention (deep brain stimulation) * has and any significant musculoskeletal or metabolic disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Joint (knee) reaction timeone yearJoint (knee) Reaction time during standing and walking perturbations.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026