Skip to content

Comparing PIEB and CEI for Labor Pain Relief

Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion vs. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Combined With Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor Pain Relief: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07395934
Acronym
COPILOT
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-02-09
Start date
2025-07-30
Completion date
2026-08-30
Last updated
2026-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Labor, Obstetric, Labor Pain

Keywords

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB), Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI), Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of two epidural analgesia maintenance methods for labor pain relief: Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) and Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI), both combined with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA). The study aims to evaluate which technique provides superior analgesia while minimizing anesthetic consumption and preserving maternal motor function. A total of 60 parturients at Family Hospital, Da Nang, will be randomly assigned to either the PIEB or CEI group. Outcomes including pain intensity (VAS scores), total drug consumption, maternal satisfaction, and neonatal Apgar scores will be assessed.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Labor and Delivery Unit of Family Hospital, Da Nang. The investigation focuses on the clinical advantages of automated high-pressure bolus delivery (PIEB) compared to constant low-pressure flow (CEI) in optimizing the spread of local anesthetics within the epidural space. Clinical Procedures: All participants receive a standardized initial manual bolus of 10 mL (0.1% Ropivacaine and 2 mcg/mL Fentanyl) to establish a baseline sensory block. Following this induction, patients are managed according to their assigned study arm: PIEB Group: Analgesia is maintained using a programmed pump set to deliver an automated bolus of 8 mL every 60 minutes, starting one hour after the initial dose. CEI Group: Analgesia is maintained via a continuous infusion of the same anesthetic solution at a constant rate of 8 mL/hour. Analgesia Management and Rescue Protocol: Both groups have access to PCEA, allowing for self-administered 5 mL boluses with a 10-minute lockout period, capped at a maximum of 20 mL per hour. To ensure maternal comfort, a standardized rescue protocol is strictly followed: if the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score remains \> 4 after two consecutive PCEA demands, a manual rescue bolus of 5 mL is administered by the anesthesia team.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPIEB + PCEA

Initial dose: 10 mL (0.1% Ropivacaine + 2 mcg/mL Fentanyl). Maintenance: 8 mL bolus every 60 mins. PCEA: 5 mL bolus, 10-min lockout.

PROCEDURECEI + PCEA

Initial dose: 10 mL (0.1% Ropivacaine + 2 mcg/mL Fentanyl). Maintenance: Continuous infusion at 8 mL/hour. PCEA: 5 mL bolus, 10-min lockout.

Sponsors

Da Nang Family General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Parturients indicated for labor analgesia for vaginal delivery via epidural anesthesia. * Age from 18 to 40 years. * Physical status: ASA II. * Singleton pregnancy, full-term, vertex presentation in labor. * Indication for vaginal delivery. * No contraindications to epidural anesthesia. * Agreement to participate in the research and signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to epidural analgesia. * History of allergy to local anesthetics (Ropivacaine) or opioids (Fentanyl). * High-risk pregnancies: Preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption. * Fetal distress or fetal abnormalities. * Chronic use of analgesic drugs or neurological/psychiatric disorders. * Parturients who refuse to participate or request to withdraw from the research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Labor Pain IntensityBaseline (prior to epidural analgesia induction), then at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the initiation of analgesia. Additional assessments are performed at full cervical dilation, during the fetal expulsion stagePain intensity is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a self-reported scale where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable". Lower scores indicate better analgesic efficacy. Score on a scale from 0 to 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Ropivacaine ConsumptionFrom the initiation of epidural analgesia until the completion of perineal repair, assessed up to 24 hours.The total dose of Ropivacaine (in milligrams) administered to each participant throughout the entire labor and delivery process. This sum includes the 10 mg initial manual bolus , the programmed intermittent boluses (8 mg/hour) or continuous infusion (8 mg/hour) , and any 5 mg patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or manual rescue doses administered.
Incidence of Maternal Motor BlockFrom the initiation of epidural analgesia, assessed at 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes, then every 2 hours until the completion of perineal repair (assessed up to 24 hours).The presence and severity of motor blockade are evaluated using the Modified Bromage Scale (0 = No motor block; 1 = Inability to raise extended legs; 2 = Inability to flex knees; 3 = Inability to flex ankles). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater motor impairment).
Maternal Satisfaction ScoreAt 2 hours after the completion of perineal repair (assessed up to 24 hours after enrollment).Overall satisfaction is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates "Not Satisfied" and 5 indicates "Very Satisfied". Higher scores mean a better outcome (greater satisfaction).
Neonatal Apgar ScoresAt 1 minute and 5 minutes post-delivery.Newborn health is assessed using the Apgar Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, calculated based on five criteria (each scored 0-2). Higher scores mean a better outcome (better neonatal condition).

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026