Skip to content

Nasojejunal Feeding Versus Oral Feeding Following Endoscopic Drainage of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis

Nasojejunal Feeding Versus Oral Feeding Following Endoscopic Drainage of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07395778
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-02-09
Start date
2025-10-18
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2026-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis (AP), Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage, Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis

Keywords

Cystogastrostomy, Walled off pancreatic necrosis, nutrition

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized control trial is to assess whether nasojejunal feed is better than oral nutrition in patients who are undergoing endoscopic cystogastrostomy of walled off necrosis following acute pancreatitis. It will also try to answer, the incidence of infections and feed tolerance. The main question it tries to answer is 1. whether nasojejunl feed is better than oral feed in patients undergoing endoscopic cystogastrostomy in walled off necrosis following acute pancreatitis 2. How much infections they develop, whether they are able to tolerate the feed, weight gain and reintervention rates in each group

Interventions

PROCEDUREendoscopic ultrasonography guided cystogastrostomy

Nasojejunal tube will be placed post EUS-CG or oral diet would be started after randomization

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients of acute pancreatitis (AP) with 18-75 years of age 2. Patients with symptomatic WON requiring EUS guided transluminal drainage 3. Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with collection not amenable for EUS guided drainage (distance of WON \>1 cm from the gastrointestinal lumen) 2. Known malignancy or immunocompromised state 3. Previous upper gastrointestinal(GI) surgery interfering with absorption 4. Active GI bleeding 5. GI obstruction, ileus or persistent vomiting 6. Patients moribund to undergo endoscopic procedure (Glasgow coma scale \<8 or patients on ventilatory support) 7. Patients with irreversible coagulopathy like platelets \<50,000/mm3 and/or INR\>1.5 8. Pregnant or lactating female

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nutritional failure14 daysTo compare the rate of nutritional failure at Day 14 between Nasojejunal and oral feeding post endoscopic transmural drainage of WON

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection and new onset organ failure14 daysTo compare infection rates, need for antibiotic escalation and new onset organ failure
Re-intervention needs14 daysTo compare the need for re-intervention and hospital stay duration in either of the group
Change in weight14 daysTo compare patient weight
Inflammatory markers14 daysTo compare change in inflammatory markers (CRP, Serum Albumin)

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTSaurabh Kumar Singh
drsaurabhkrsingh@gmail.com+919560113930
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSurender Singh Rana, Professor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026