Skip to content

Effect of Repetitive Bihemispheric Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Function of Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Effect of Repetitive Bihemispheric Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Function of Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07395531
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-09
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2026-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease, PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)

Keywords

tDCS, Parkinson's Disease, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Brief summary

Dopaminergic medications and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are the current standards interventions for Parkinson's Disease. Pharmacotherapy with dopaminergic drugs leads to partial improvement in motor functions of patients. Invasive therapies like DBS have as yet limited availability and accessibility, with risk of adverse events as well. Non invasive therapies like Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) are currently increasingly being probed for their therapeutic value, in view of their safety, portability and convenience of administration. Improvement in motor function immediately after a single session of tDCS has been observed. The effect of single simulation is not sustained beyond a few days. Only few studies with varied sites of stimulation have evaluated the effect of repetitive tDCS on motor function improvement in patients with Parkinson's Disease, with conflicting results. There is an unmet need to probe the utility of repetitive tDCS on motor function of patients with Parkinson's Disease. We aim to probe the effect of repetitive tDCS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and M1 cortex on motor function in patients with Parkinson's Disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 to 4).

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Anodal tDCS stimulation

Sponsors

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients fulfilling the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. 2. Patients with Hoehn \& Yahr stages 2-4 Parkinson's disease. 3. Patients maintained on stable medical regimen for at least 1 month before entering the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with other confounding neurological and psychiatric disorders. 2. The presence of metal objects or stimulators in the head. 3. Patients with a history of deep brain stimulation. 4. Patients with history of seizures. 5. Patients with skull defect due to surgery e.g. craniectomy 6. Patients with scalp condition likely to obstruct application of electrodes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine change in motor function score as assessed by Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part - III scale 1 week after the repetitive tDCS (Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 132, higher scores indicate more disability)1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the change in Timed Up and Go test score of patients with Parkinson's Disease at 1 week after the repetitive tDCS (higher times indicate disability with increased risk of fall)1 week

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTAshish Kumar Duggal, Doctor (Professor)
ashishduggal2005@gmail.com+919810523332
CONTACTDevavrata Sahu, Doctor
devsahu.90@gmail.com+918800815928
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAshish Kumar Duggal, DM (Neurology)

Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026