Skip to content

Digital Self-Monitoring in Severe Asthma

Effect of Digital Self-Monitoring on Patient Engagement and Clinical Outcomes in Severe Asthma: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07393984
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-06
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, Severe Asthma

Keywords

Severe asthma, Telemedicine, Digital health, Home spirometry, Adherence, Patient engagement, Reminders, eHealth

Brief summary

This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to assess adherence to telemedicine-based home monitoring using the AioCare digital respiratory system in adults with severe asthma over a three-month period and to determine whether weekly reminder messages sent via SMS or through the AioCare platform enhanced adherence compared with standard remote monitoring. The study was conducted at a single center in Timișoara, Romania, between October 2024 and October 2025. Thirty adult patients with severe asthma were randomized 1:1 to either an intervention group receiving weekly reminders via SMS or in-app notifications, or a control group without reminders. All participants performed weekly home spirometry for 12 weeks using the AioCare system. The primary objective of the study was to assess adherence to telemedicine-based home monitoring over the three-month period and to evaluate the effect of weekly reminder messages on adherence compared with standard remote monitoring. The study found that patients who received reminder messages demonstrated higher adherence to home monitoring compared with those who did not receive reminders. No device-related adverse events were reported.

Detailed description

This study investigated telemedicine-based home monitoring in adults with severe asthma using the AioCare digital respiratory system in a real-world clinical setting. Participants were equipped with a portable AioCare spirometry device and trained to use the associated mobile application for home measurements. The system enabled wireless transmission of spirometric data to a secure cloud-based platform, allowing remote review of patient-generated data by the study team. After enrollment and training, patients performed regular home spirometry over a three-month monitoring period. Measurements were conducted in the patients' home environment and automatically uploaded through the AioCare platform. Data quality was assessed according to international acceptability and repeatability criteria. One study group additionally received automated weekly reminder messages delivered via SMS or through the AioCare application, depending on technical availability and patient preference. These reminders were standardized and intended to support regular performance of home measurements. The comparator group used the same monitoring system without reminders. Throughout the study, participants continued their usual standard-of-care treatment. No experimental medications or therapeutic interventions were introduced. Study procedures focused on remote data collection, monitoring feasibility, and patient interaction with the digital health system. At the end of the monitoring period, patient-reported questionnaires were administered to document user experience with the telemonitoring system. Safety was monitored throughout the study, with specific attention to device-related adverse events.

Interventions

DEVICEAioCare home spirometry system

The AioCare digital respiratory system was used to perform weekly home spirometry and to transmit lung function data to a secure telemedicine platform for remote monitoring by the study team.

Sponsors

University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This was a single-center, randomized, parallel-group pilot study. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group receiving weekly reminder messages via SMS or via the AioCare platform, or to a control group receiving standard telemedicine-based home monitoring without reminders.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of severe asthma according to GINA guidelines. * Age ≥ 18 years. * Ability to correctly perform spirometry maneuvers according to ATS/ERS standards after training. * Access to a smartphone compatible with the AioCare application. * Willingness to participate in weekly home-based spirometry monitoring and telemonitoring for three months. * Stable maintenance asthma therapy for at least four weeks prior to enrollment. * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Diagnosis of other significant respiratory diseases (including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, or bronchiectasis). * Asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalization or systemic corticosteroids within the four weeks prior to enrollment. * Severe psychiatric or cognitive impairment that could interfere with adherence to the monitoring protocol or ability to use the device independently. * Inability to perform acceptable spirometry maneuvers despite training. * Lack of smartphone or internet access required for AioCare telemonitoring. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to telemedicine-based home monitoring12 weeksProportion of prescribed weekly home spirometry sessions successfully completed and transmitted via the AioCare system during the 12-week monitoring period.
Asthma control assessed by ACTBaseline and 12 weeksChange in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score from baseline to week 12. The ACT is a validated 5-item questionnaire, with scores ranging from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better asthma control. Scores ≥20 indicate well-controlled asthma, 16-19 partially controlled, and ≤15 poorly controlled. A change of ≥3 points is considered clinically meaningful.

Countries

Romania

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNorbert Wellmann, MD, Phd student

Victor Babes Hospital for Infectious and Pulmonary Diseases, Timisoara, Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026