Skip to content

Obesity on the Efficacy of Bilateral Tibial Nerve Stimulation

Impact of Obesity on the Efficacy of Bilateral Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Obstructed Defecation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07390682
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-02-05
Start date
2026-02-15
Completion date
2026-03-28
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructed Defecation

Keywords

Obesity, Bilateral Tibial Nerve Stimulation, Obstructed Defecation, ODS, BT PTNS

Brief summary

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a common functional bowel disorder characterized by difficulty in stool evacuation. Bilateral posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BT PTNS) has emerged as a noninvasive, safe, and effective therapeutic option for functional ODS, improving symptom severity and quality of life.

Detailed description

Obesity is associated with altered pelvic floor mechanics, which may affect the response to neuromodulation therapy. However, the effect of obesity on BT PTNS outcomes in ODS has not been systematically evaluated. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by comparing treatment efficacy between obese and non-obese patients.

Interventions

* Procedure: BT PTNS will be administered via transcutaneous electrodes placed bilaterally along the posterior tibial nerve at the medial malleolus. * Frequency: 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks (total of 18 sessions). * Duration per Session: 30 minutes. * Monitoring: Patients will be monitored for adverse events during and after each session.

Sponsors

General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of functional obstructed defecation (Rome IV criteria). * Able to provide informed consent. * BMI ≥30 kg/m² (obese group) or BMI \<30 kg/m² (non-obese group).

Exclusion criteria

* Organic causes of constipation (e.g., colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease). * Previous pelvic floor surgery. * Neurological disorders affecting bowel function. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Current use of other neuromodulation therapies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in symptom severity measured by the Modified Obstructed Defecation Score (MODS).Within 6 weeks of treatment.Scale range: 0 to 24 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate more severe obstructed defecation symptoms Unit of measure: Units on a validated symptom severity scale. No aggregation of different measurements into a single reported value is performed. Each scale is analyzed independently. In response to the Advisory Issue, we have included the unabbreviated titles of the scales, their minimum and maximum values, and clarified whether higher scores represent better or worse outcomes for each outcome measure.
Change in quality of life measured by the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL).Within 6 weeks of treatment.Scale range: 0 to 96 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse constipation-related quality of life Unit of measure: Mean score on a validated quality-of-life scale No aggregation of different measurements into a single reported value is performed. Each scale is analyzed independently. In response to the Advisory Issue, we have included the unabbreviated titles of the scales, their minimum and maximum values, and clarified whether higher scores represent better or worse outcomes for each outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic floor functionWithin 6 weeks of treatment.To assess the impact of obesity on pelvic floor function using electromyography (EMG). Electromyograpghy (EMG) a diagnostic test that evaluates the electrical signals between your nerves and muscles to check for neuromuscular problems like nerve damage or muscle diseases. It usually involves two parts: a nerve conduction study (NCS) using surface electrodes to measure nerve signal speed, and a needle EMG where a tiny needle electrode is inserted into a muscle to record its activity at rest and during contraction, revealing abnormalities. To assess amplitude, number of turns and duration of pelvic floor muscle.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026