Skip to content

Intradialytic Resistance and Flexibility Exercise in Hemodialysis Patients

Effects of Intradialytic Resistance and Flexibility Exercises on Clinical Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07390656
Enrollment
49
Registered
2026-02-05
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2021-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis

Keywords

Intradialytic exercise, Resistance exercise, Flexibility exercise, Quality of life, Clinical outcomes

Brief summary

This study examined whether different types of exercise performed during hemodialysis sessions affect patients' health and quality of life. Patients receiving regular hemodialysis were assigned to resistance exercise, flexibility exercise, or usual care during dialysis. Changes in health-related outcomes were evaluated before and after the exercise period.

Detailed description

This single-center pilot study was conducted to explore the effects of exercise performed during hemodialysis on patients' health. Adult patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis participated in one of three groups: resistance exercise, flexibility exercise, or usual care without exercise. The exercise programs were carried out during routine dialysis sessions under supervision. Patients' clinical measurements and self-reported health outcomes were assessed at the start of the study and again after completion of the exercise period. The study was carried out between December 2020 and April 2021 following approval by the institutional ethics committee.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALResistance Exercise

A structured resistance exercise program performed during routine hemodialysis sessions under supervision.

A structured flexibility and stretching exercise program performed during routine hemodialysis sessions under supervision.

Sponsors

Dilek GİBYELİ GENEK
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Due to the nature of the exercise interventions, masking was not feasible.

Intervention model description

Participants were assigned to resistance exercise, flexibility exercise, or usual care groups and followed in parallel during the study period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * Receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months * Stable clinical condition * Ability to participate in exercise during hemodialysis sessions * Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Acute illness or unstable cardiovascular disease * Severe musculoskeletal or neurological conditions limiting exercise * Recent hospitalization * Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation * Participation in another structured exercise program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in dialysis adequacy assessed by Kt/V (urea)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in dialysis adequacy measured by single-pool Kt/V (urea).
Change in dialysis adequacy assessed by urea reduction ratio (URR)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in dialysis adequacy measured by urea reduction ratio (URR), expressed as a percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health-Related Quality of Life scoreFrom baseline to 12 weeksChange in health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), a validated 36-item questionnaire. SF-36 domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Change in Beck Depression Inventory scoreFrom baseline to 12 weeksChange in depressive symptoms assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Change in body mass index (BMI)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m\^2). Higher BMI indicates greater body mass relative to height.
Change in fat tissue index (FTI)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in fat tissue index (FTI) assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), calculated from fat tissue mass (FTM) normalized to height squared (kg/m\^2).
Change in lean tissue index (LTI)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in lean tissue index (LTI) assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), calculated from lean tissue mass normalized to height squared (kg/m\^2).
Change in physical function assessed by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT)From baseline to 12 weeksChange in physical function assessed using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), measured as the total distance walked in meters.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDilek Gibyeli Genek, MD

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026