Skip to content

School Meals in Denmark

School Meals in Denmark: Evaluation of a National School Meal Pilot Program on Children's Health, Learning and Well-being - a Natural Experiment

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07389421
Enrollment
3200
Registered
2026-02-05
Start date
2026-02-11
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood Obesity, Childhood Obesity Pevention, Cognitive Abilities, Diet Habits, Healthy, Well-being/Quality of Life

Keywords

physical health, well-being, learning, diet

Brief summary

This study looks at how a national school meal program affects the health, well-being, and learning of Danish schoolchildren aged 10 to 15 years. The study is part of the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program (2025-2028), which provides free school meals at selected public schools. Some school classes receive free school meals, while other classes do not and are used for comparison. Children are followed for about 1.5 years. Information is collected before and after the program using simple health measurements, questionnaires about well-being, and age-appropriate cognitive tests. The study also uses information from Danish national registers to better understand the children's background and to study longer-term outcomes related to health, education, and social conditions. In addition, the study examines whether school meal programs are cost-effective by comparing their costs with potential benefits for children and society. The goal of the study is to find out whether free school meals can improve children's health, well-being, and learning, and help reduce social differences.

Detailed description

School Meals in Denmark is a prospective, open-label, matched-pair cluster-randomized controlled study conducted as a natural experiment alongside the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program. As allocation to the national program is determined by the Danish Ministry of Children and Education and not by the investigators, the study evaluates the effects of school meals under real-world conditions without introducing an additional experimental intervention. Approximately 3,200 children in grades 3, 4, and 7 from 32 public schools are included. Participating schools are matched in pairs based on socioeconomic and geographic characteristics using national statistical data. Recruitment includes schools implementing the program either at the middle grades or at the lower secondary level. At each school, intervention classes are identified at the grade level receiving school meals. Control classes are recruited pragmatically from the same schools but at a different grade level than the intervention classes. Intervention effects are estimated by comparing classes at the same grade level across matched schools, where one school implements the school meal program at that grade and the matched school does not. This approach allows for within-school control recruitment while preserving between-school comparisons at the same grade level. Data are collected at two time points over a follow-up period of approximately 1.5 years using a pre-post design. Outcomes include anthropometric measures (height, weight, body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance), cardiovascular indicators (blood pressure and resting heart rate), tablet-based cognitive performance tests, and child-reported questionnaires on well-being and psychosocial functioning. Parents complete brief electronic questionnaires addressing their child's psychosocial functioning and dietary habits. In addition, observations of school meal settings are conducted to assess food intake and food waste, and menu plans from meal providers are collected to evaluate nutritional quality and compliance with dietary guidelines. The study is designed to generate robust evidence on the real-world effects of school meal programs on children's health, well-being, and learning outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSchool meal classes

Natural experiment embedded within the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program (2025-2028), which offers free school meals to selected public schools. Children receive a free school-provided meal (typically lunch) five days per week. Meals vary across schools, as each school selects its own meal provider. All meals must comply with the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and the Danish Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, with a focus on fish, whole grains, fruits and vegetables, access to drinking water, and the promotion of children's food literacy.

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
The Novo Nordic Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a pragmatic, matched-pair, cluster-randomized study conducted as a natural experiment. Allocation to the school meal program is determined at the school and grade level by a national policy initiative and not by the investigators. Schools are matched in pairs based on socioeconomic and geographic characteristics. Within each matched pair, intervention effects are estimated by comparing classes at the same grade level across schools, where one school implements the school meal program and the matched school does not. Control classes are recruited pragmatically from the same schools at a different grade level than the intervention classes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All children attending 3rd, 4th or 7th grade in the recruited schools

Exclusion criteria

* No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Well-being/health related quality of lifeBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the total summary score of health-related quality of life measured with the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer. The questionnaire assesses the child's physical well-being (5 items), psychological well-being (7 items), peers and social support (4 items), and school environment (4 items). Autonomy and parent relation (7 items) are not used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Psychological functioningBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the total difficulties score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using child reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. An overall total difficulties score is calculated, along with five subscale scores: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention, relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.
Internalizing problemsBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the internalizing problem score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of the emotional symptoms and peer problems scales scores. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Externalizing problemsBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the externalizing behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention subscales scores. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Prosocial BehaviorBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the prosocial behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Psychological functioning (2)Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the total difficulties score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using parent reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. An overall total difficulties score is calculated, along with five subscale scores: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention, relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.
Externalizing problems (2)Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the externalizing behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention subscales scores. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Internalizing problems (2)Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the internalizing problem score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of the emotional symptoms and peer problems scales scores. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Prosocial Behavior (2)Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the prosocial behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
WHO-5 Well-Being IndexBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the 5-question self-report tool from the World Health Organization measuring subjective mental well-being over the past two weeks, assessing feelings like cheerfulness, calmness, and interest.
School environmentBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the school environment (4 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.
Peers and social supportBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the peers and social support (4 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.
Psychological well-beingBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the psychological well-being (7 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.
Physical well-beingBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in the physical well-being (5 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.
Resting blood pressure in mmHgBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Resting heart rate beats/minBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in heart rate.
Fat mass in kgBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in fat mass measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
Fat free mass in kgBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in fat free mass measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
Fat mass index in kg/m2Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in fat mass index measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
Fat free mass index in kg/m2Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in fat free mass index measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
Fat-Free-Mass-to-Fat-Mass ratioBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in FFM-to-FM ratio measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
% Fat MassBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in % FM in kg measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).
Weight status in %Baseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in prevalence of children with underweight, normalweight, overweight and obesity, based on the cutoffs defined by Cole et al. and the International Task Force of Obesity. Body weight is measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270) and height by using a portable stadiometer.
BMI z-scoreBaseline, 16-22 monthsBetween group difference in change in BMI z-score based on WHO references. Weight and height is measured using weight from the bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270) and a portable stadiometer, respectively.
Sustained attentionBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of sustained attention ability assessed as errors during a sustained test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).
Spatial working memoryBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of spatial working memory assessed as errors and strategy during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).
Inhibitory controlBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of inhibitory control assessed as errors during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).
Cognitive flexibilityBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of cognitive flexibility assessed as errors during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).
Fine motor controlBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of fine motor control assessed as endpoint accuracy during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).
Processing speedBaseline, 16-22 monthsPerformance in neuropsychological assessment of processing speed as choice reaction time (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

Contacts

CONTACTNikolai N Nordsborg, PhD
nbn@nexs.ku.dk+4528751612
CONTACTPaulina S Melby, PhD
paulina@nexs.ku.dk+4527266039
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNikolai B Nordsborg, PhD

University of Copenhagen

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026