Skip to content

ESPB vs SPSIP for Postoperative Analgesia After CABG

A Randomized Trial Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07388745
Acronym
ESP-SPSIP-CABG
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-02-05
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Arterial Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery, Postoperative Pain Management

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block, Regional Anesthesia, Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block, Postoperative Pain, Numeric Rating Scale

Brief summary

This prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study compares the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) versus bilateral Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) in adult patients (45-85 years, ASA I-III) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative fentanyl/remifentanil consumption, postoperative morphine consumption, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demand/delivery parameters (if PCA is used), need for rescue analgesics, extubation and mobilization times, peak inspiratory flow measured by incentive spirometry at predefined time points, ICU and hospital length of stay, recovery quality (QoR-15 at 0, 24, and 48 hours), mortality, and block-related adverse events.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

Bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB performed preoperatively under sedation at the T4-T5 transverse process level using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (total 40 mL).

Bilateral ultrasound-guided SPSIPB performed preoperatively under sedation at the 2nd-3rd intercostal space using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (total 40 mL).

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 45-85 years * Scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III * Patients who provide written informed consent and agree to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency cases * ASA IV-V * Known allergy to local anesthetics * Coagulopathy (platelet count \<100,000/mm³, INR \>1.5, aPTT \>1.5× normal) * Infection at the block injection site * Pregnancy * Patients who do not provide written informed consent or decline to participate after being informed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain intensity2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after surgeryPain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative postoperative opioid consumptionFirst 24 hours after surgeryTotal opioid dose for analgesia converted to IV morphine equivalents.
Need for rescue analgesiaUp to 48 hours after surgeryProportion of participants requiring rescue analgesics in addition to the standardized protocol.
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scoreBaseline (preoperative), postoperative 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery"The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) is a patient-reported measure consisting of 15 items. Each item is scored from 0 (unfavourable) to 10 (favourable), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 150. Higher total scores indicate better postoperative recovery.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTMerve Yaman, Assistant Professor
merve.yaman@ksbu.edu.tr+905363794742
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMerve Yaman, Assistant Professor

Kütahya Health Sciences University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 6, 2026