Skip to content

Functional Training in Adolescent Table Tennis

The Effect of Functional Training on Speed, Balance, and Functional Capacity in Adolescent Table Tennis Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07384806
Acronym
FT in Adolesce
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-03
Start date
2025-11-15
Completion date
2026-01-03
Last updated
2026-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Training in Adolescent Table Tennis Players

Keywords

Functional Training, Table Tennis, Adolescents, Physical Performance, Agility, Balance, Speed, Functional Movement Screen, Vertical Jump, Multi-Joint Exercises

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effects of an eight-week functional training program on physical performance parameters in adolescent table tennis players. Functional training involves multi-joint and multi-plane exercises designed to improve movement quality, strength, balance, and coordination. Thirty adolescent table tennis players will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Functional Training, Conventional Training, or Control (routine training). The Functional Training group will perform a structured functional exercise program in addition to regular table tennis training, while the Conventional Training group will continue standard training routines. The Control group will maintain regular practice only. Physical performance variables including flexibility, agility, speed, vertical jump performance, functional movement patterns, and balance will be assessed before, during, and after the intervention period.

Detailed description

This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of an eight-week functional training program on physical performance in adolescent table tennis players. Functional training focuses on multi-joint, multi-planar exercises aimed at improving movement efficiency, balance, strength, and neuromuscular coordination. Thirty adolescent table tennis players aged 12-16 years with at least three years of training experience will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of three groups: Functional Training, Conventional Training, or Control. The Functional Training group will perform a structured exercise program consisting of dynamic, whole-body movements designed to enhance agility, balance, speed, and movement quality. Training sessions will be conducted three times per week for eight weeks in addition to regular table tennis practice. The Conventional Training group will continue standard technical and tactical training without additional functional exercises. The Control group will maintain routine training only. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. Assessments will include flexibility, agility, sprint speed, vertical jump performance, Functional Movement Screen scores, and static and dynamic balance measures. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention.

Interventions

Eight-week functional training program focusing on flexibility, agility, speed, balance, and movement quality. Training is performed three times per week alongside regular table tennis practice.

BEHAVIORALConventional Training

Standard table tennis training performed three times per week for eight weeks without additional functional exercises.

Sponsors

Alirıza Han Civan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking was applied in this study. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were aware of group assignments.

Intervention model description

This study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of functional training on physical performance in adolescent table tennis players. Participants are randomly allocated to one of three groups: Functional Training, Conventional Training, or Control. Measurements are taken at pre-test, mid-test, and post-test timepoints.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female adolescent table tennis players aged 12-18 years. * Actively training and competing in table tennis for at least 2 years. * Participating in at least 3 training sessions per week. * Free from injury or medical conditions affecting physical performance. * Voluntarily consent to participate in the study (parental consent required for minors).

Exclusion criteria

* Any musculoskeletal injury, neurological disorder, or medical condition affecting training or performance. * Participation in another structured training program during the study period. * Non-compliance with study protocol or inability to attend scheduled sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Physical Performance ScoreBaseline (pre-test), mid-intervention (week 4), and post-intervention (week 8)Overall physical performance will be assessed using a battery of standardized physical performance tests including flexibility, agility, speed, vertical jump height, balance, and Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Flexibility: Sit-and-Reach Test (cm; higher values indicate better flexibility) Agility: T-test (seconds; lower values indicate better performance) Speed: 10-meter sprint test (seconds; lower values indicate better performance) Vertical Jump: Countermovement jump height (cm; higher values indicate better performance) Balance: Static and dynamic balance tests (test-specific scoring; higher scores indicate better balance) Functional Movement Screen (FMS): Composite score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating better movement quality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flexibility (Sit-and-Reach Test)Baseline (pre-test), mid-intervention (week 4), and post-intervention (week 8)Flexibility will be assessed using a sit-and-reach test that measures the flexibility of the hamstring and lower back muscles. Measurement: Sit-and-reach Test Unit: centimeters (cm) Range: Typically 0-50 cm Direction: Higher scores indicate better flexibility

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlirıza Han Civan, Dr

Karabük Üniversitesi Hasan Doğan Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Spor Yöneticiliği Bölümü

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026